Literature DB >> 23169067

A new surgical technique (modified Osaka technique) of sacral resection by posterior-only approach: description and preliminary results.

Andrea Angelini1, Pietro Ruggieri.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Operative technique.
OBJECTIVE: To report a new technique for sacral resection, with short-term preliminary results. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although various reports analyzed en bloc excision of sacral tumors, there are still technical problems to improve protection of nerve roots, preserve surrounding structures, and reduce intraoperative bleeding, while maintaining the oncological result.
METHODS: Thirteen patients were resected for their sacrococcygeal tumor by following the described technique. Two patients had undergone previous surgery elsewhere. The sacrum was exposed by a posterior midline incision and complete soft-tissue dissection. Lateral osteotomies were performed through the sacral foramina using a threadwire saw (devised by Tomita and Kawahara) and Kerrison rongeurs, to avoid damage to the sacral roots. After proximal osteotomy, the sacrum was laterally elevated and mobilized to allow dissection of presacral structures. Mean surgical time was 5.5 hours (range; 1.5-8). Mean blood loss was 2961 mL (range; 1000-8000 mL).
RESULTS: Level of resection was proximal in 9 patients and at S3 or below in 4. Margins were wide in 10 patients, marginal in 1, and intralesional in 2. At a mean follow-up of 35.5 months, 9 patients were disease free, while the tumor recurred locally in 4 cases. Complications requiring surgery were seen in 1 case.
CONCLUSION: The reported technique allows wide margins with preservation of roots, and reduction in blood loss and operative time. Indications for posterior-only approach can be extended to resection proximal to S3, when there is minimal pelvic invasion and none or partial involvement of sacroiliac joints. However, the long-term benefits of this technique need to be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23169067     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827db1ba

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  The extended posterior approach for resection of sacral tumours.

Authors:  S P Mohanty; Madhava Pai Kanhangad; Raghuraj Kundangar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Complications, secondary interventions and long term morbidity after en bloc sacrectomy.

Authors:  J J Verlaan; J S Kuperus; W B Slooff; A Hennipman; F C Oner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Prevalence of neuropathic pain after radical sacral chordoma resection: an observational cohort study with 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Rapin Phimolsarnti; Saranatra Waikakul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-09

4.  One-piece bone flap osteotomy using thread wire saw for fronto-orbital advancement with distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Masanobu Yamashita; Takuya Akai; Miyuki Kishibe; Kenichi Shimada
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Clinical manifestations, classification, and surgical management of sacral tumors and the need for personalized approach to sacrectomy.

Authors:  Brian Fiani; Juliana Runnels; Alexander Rose; Athanasios Kondilis; Amelia Wong; Brian L Musch
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-05-03

6.  Laparoscopic assisted resection of a ilio-sacral chondrosarcoma: A single case report.

Authors:  Marc Possover; Kurt Uehlinger; G Ulrich Exner
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-28

Review 7.  Recent advances in understanding and managing chordomas.

Authors:  Carl Youssef; Salah G Aoun; Jessica R Moreno; Carlos A Bagley
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-12-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.