OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the ability of a new prenatal diagnostic platform - prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ (BoBs™) in detecting mosaicism by comparison to quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR). METHODS: A validation study of prenatal BoBs™ was firstly performed using 18 artificially constructing mosaic samples involving various aneuploidies and microdeletion conditions. Additionally, we compared the accuracy between prenatal BoBs™ and QF-PCR for 18 archived clinical mosaic cases and nine chromosomally abnormal cell lines with reference to conventional karyotype results. RESULTS: In the validation study, BoBs™ allowed the detection of mosaicism at a level of 20-40%. Among the clinical mosaic cases, 14/18 cases were within the detection of BoBs™, 8/14 (57.1%) could be identified by BoBs™ and 6/9 (66.7%) by QF-PCR, but 6/14 (42.9%) were missed by both tests. Three cases (16.7%) were detected by prenatal BoBs™ but missed by QF-PCR, whereas QF-PCR detected one case that was missed by BoBs™. The overall sensitivity of BoBs™ in detecting mosaicism is 44.4% (8/18), which is slightly higher than that of QF-PCR (33.3%; 6/18). CONCLUSION: Prenatal BoBs™ has a sensitivity of 57.1% in the detection clinical mosaic cases. According to the validation test, mosaicism of 20% or greater is detectable by the BoBs™ assay.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the ability of a new prenatal diagnostic platform - prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ (BoBs™) in detecting mosaicism by comparison to quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR). METHODS: A validation study of prenatal BoBs™ was firstly performed using 18 artificially constructing mosaic samples involving various aneuploidies and microdeletion conditions. Additionally, we compared the accuracy between prenatal BoBs™ and QF-PCR for 18 archived clinical mosaic cases and nine chromosomally abnormal cell lines with reference to conventional karyotype results. RESULTS: In the validation study, BoBs™ allowed the detection of mosaicism at a level of 20-40%. Among the clinical mosaic cases, 14/18 cases were within the detection of BoBs™, 8/14 (57.1%) could be identified by BoBs™ and 6/9 (66.7%) by QF-PCR, but 6/14 (42.9%) were missed by both tests. Three cases (16.7%) were detected by prenatal BoBs™ but missed by QF-PCR, whereas QF-PCR detected one case that was missed by BoBs™. The overall sensitivity of BoBs™ in detecting mosaicism is 44.4% (8/18), which is slightly higher than that of QF-PCR (33.3%; 6/18). CONCLUSION: Prenatal BoBs™ has a sensitivity of 57.1% in the detection clinical mosaic cases. According to the validation test, mosaicism of 20% or greater is detectable by the BoBs™ assay.
Authors: Zirui Dong; Matthew Hoi Kin Chau; Yanyan Zhang; Zhenjun Yang; Mengmeng Shi; Yi Man Wah; Yvonne K Kwok; Tak Yeung Leung; Cynthia C Morton; Kwong Wai Choy Journal: Genet Med Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 8.822