Literature DB >> 23168823

Effect of citicoline on functional and cognitive status among patients with traumatic brain injury: Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment Trial (COBRIT).

Ross D Zafonte1, Emilia Bagiella, Beth M Ansel, Thomas A Novack, William T Friedewald, Dale C Hesdorffer, Shelly D Timmons, Jack Jallo, Howard Eisenberg, Tessa Hart, Joseph H Ricker, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, Randall E Merchant, Nancy R Temkin, Sherry Melton, Sureyya S Dikmen.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious public health problem in the United States, yet no treatment is currently available to improve outcome after TBI. Approved for use in TBI in 59 countries, citicoline is an endogenous substance offering potential neuroprotective properties as well as facilitated neurorepair post injury.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of citicoline to positively affect functional and cognitive status in persons with complicated mild, moderate, and severe TBI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The Citicoline Brain Injury Treatment Trial (COBRIT), a phase 3, double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted between July 20, 2007, and February 4, 2011, among 1213 patients at 8 US level 1 trauma centers to investigate effects of citicoline vs placebo in patients with TBI classified as complicated mild, moderate, or severe. INTERVENTION: Ninety-day regimen of daily enteral or oral citicoline (2000 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional and cognitive status, assessed at 90 days using the TBI-Clinical Trials Network Core Battery. A global statistical test was used to analyze the 9 scales of the core battery. Secondary outcomes were functional and cognitive improvement, assessed at 30, 90, and 180 days, and examination of the long-term maintenance of treatment effects.
RESULTS: Rates of favorable improvement for the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended were 35.4% in the citicoline group and 35.6% in the placebo group. For all other scales the rate of improvement ranged from 37.3% to 86.5% in the citicoline group and from 42.7% to 84.0% in the placebo group. The citicoline and placebo groups did not differ significantly at the 90-day evaluation (global odds ratio [OR], 0.98 [95% CI, 0.83-1.15]); in addition, there was no significant treatment effect in the 2 severity subgroups (global OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.88-1.49] and 0.89 [95% CI, 0.72-1.49] for moderate/severe and complicated mild TBI, respectively). At the 180-day evaluation, the citicoline and placebo groups did not differ significantly with respect to the primary outcome (global OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.72-1.04]).
CONCLUSION: Among patients with traumatic brain injury, the use of citicoline compared with placebo for 90 days did not result in improvement in functional and cognitive status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00545662.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23168823     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.13256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  56 in total

1.  Preliminary Associations Between Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Memory Impairment, Functional Cognition, and Depressive Symptoms Following Severe TBI.

Authors:  Michelle D Failla; Shannon B Juengst; Patricia M Arenth; Amy K Wagner
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 2.  Alterations in Cholinergic Pathways and Therapeutic Strategies Targeting Cholinergic System after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Samuel S Shin; C Edward Dixon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 3.  Combination therapies for neurobehavioral and cognitive recovery after experimental traumatic brain injury: Is more better?

Authors:  Anthony E Kline; Jacob B Leary; Hannah L Radabaugh; Jeffrey P Cheng; Corina O Bondi
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Association of a common genetic variant within ANKK1 with six-month cognitive performance after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  John K Yue; Angela M Pronger; Adam R Ferguson; Nancy R Temkin; Sourabh Sharma; Jonathan Rosand; Marco D Sorani; Thomas W McAllister; Jason Barber; Ethan A Winkler; Esteban G Burchard; Donglei Hu; Hester F Lingsma; Shelly R Cooper; Ava M Puccio; David O Okonkwo; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  Neurogenetics       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.660

5.  Combination Therapies for Traumatic Brain Injury: Retrospective Considerations.

Authors:  Susan Margulies; Gail Anderson; Fahim Atif; Jerome Badaut; Robert Clark; Philip Empey; Maria Guseva; Michael Hoane; Jimmy Huh; Jim Pauly; Ramesh Raghupathi; Stephen Scheff; Donald Stein; Huiling Tang; Mona Hicks
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Citicoline in stroke and TBI clinical trials.

Authors:  Rao Muralikrishna Adibhatla
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Acute Traumatic Coagulopathy Accompanying Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury is Associated with Worse Long-Term Functional and Cognitive Outcomes.

Authors:  Peter A Abdelmalik; David W Boorman; Joseph Tracy; Jack Jallo; Fred Rincon
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 8.  Citicoline in addictive disorders: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicholas D Wignall; E Sherwood Brown
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.829

9.  A clinical decision rule to predict intracranial hypertension in severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Aziz S Alali; Nancy Temkin; Jason Barber; Jim Pridgeon; Kelley Chaddock; Sureyya Dikmen; Peter Hendrickson; Walter Videtta; Silvia Lujan; Gustavo Petroni; Nahuel Guadagnoli; Zulma Urbina; Randall M Chesnut
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Comparative study of outcome measures and analysis methods for traumatic brain injury trials.

Authors:  Aziz S Alali; Darcy Vavrek; Jason Barber; Sureyya Dikmen; Avery B Nathens; Nancy R Temkin
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.