Literature DB >> 23168611

Femoral venous oxygen saturation is no surrogate for central venous oxygen saturation.

Paul A van Beest1, Alice van der Schors, Henriëtte Liefers, Ludo G J Coenen, Richard L Braam, Najib Habib, Annemarije Braber, Thomas W L Scheeren, Michaël A Kuiper, Peter E Spronk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine if central venous oxygen saturation and femoral venous oxygen saturation can be used interchangeably during surgery and in critically ill patients.
DESIGN: Prospective observational controlled study.
SETTING: Nonacademic university-affiliated teaching hospital in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: One hundred cardiac outpatients, 30 high-risk surgical patients, and 30 critically ill patients.
INTERVENTIONS: None. METHODS AND MAIN
RESULTS: We concurrently determined femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation in a group of 100 stable cardiac patients, which served as control group. Furthermore, we determined simultaneously femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation in 30 surgical patients and in 30 critically ill patients and evaluated changes over time. Correlation and agreement of femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation were assessed, including the difference between femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation.Despite significant correlation between obtained values of femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation (rs = 0.55; p < .001), the limits of agreement were wide in the control group (mean bias 2.7% ± 7.9%; 95% limits of agreement -12.9% to 18.2%). In both the surgical and critically ill patients, limits of agreement (mean bias of -1.9% ± 9.3%; 95% limits of agreement -20.0% to 16.3%, and mean bias of 4.6% ± 14.3%; 95% limits of agreement -23.5% to 32.6%, respectively) were wide. Results for changes of femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation were similar. During initial treatment of critically ill patients, the difference between femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation including its range of variation diminished.
CONCLUSION: There is lack of agreement between femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation in both stable and unstable medical conditions. Thus, femoral venous oxygen saturation should not be used as surrogate for central venous oxygen saturation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23168611     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182657591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Venous saturation : Between oxygen delivery and consumption].

Authors:  V Mezger; F Balzer; M Habicher; M Sander
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 0.840

2.  Differential Responses of Post-Exercise Recovery of Leg Blood Flow and Oxygen Uptake Kinetics in HFpEF versus HFrEF.

Authors:  Richard B Thompson; Joseph J Pagano; Kory W Mathewson; Ian Paterson; Jason R Dyck; Dalane W Kitzman; Mark J Haykowsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Use of femoral vein catheters for the assessment of perfusion parameters.

Authors:  Yara Nishiyama Marti; Flávia Ribeiro Machado
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun

4.  Is venous blood drawn from femoral access adequate to estimate the central venous oxygen saturation and arterial lactate levels in critically ill patients?

Authors:  Yara Nishiyama Marti; Flávio Geraldo Rezende de Freitas; Rodrigo Palácio de Azevedo; Milena Leão; Antônio Tonete Bafi; Flavia Ribeiro Machado
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.