OBJECTIVE: Among postmenopausal women who do not use estrogen therapy (ET), we have previously reported that intensive lifestyle modification (ILS) leads to increases in sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and that such increases are associated with reductions in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-hour postchallenge glucose (2HG). Oral ET decreases FPG and increases 2HG while increasing both SHBG and estradiol (E2). It is unknown if ILS reduces glucose among ET users, if changes in SHBG and E2 might mediate any glucose decreases in ET users, and if these patterns differ from those in non-ET users. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of postmenopausal women in the Diabetes Prevention Program who used ET at baseline and 1-year follow-up (n = 324) and who did not use ET at either time point (n = 382). Participants were randomized to ILS, metformin, or placebo administered at 850 mg BID. RESULTS: ET users were younger, more often white, and more likely to have had bilateral oophorectomy than non-ET users. Among ET users, ILS reduced FPG (P < 0.01) and 2HG (P < 0.01), and metformin reduced FPG (P < 0.01) but not 2HG (P = 0.56), compared with placebo. Associations between SHBG and total E2 with FPG and 2HG were not significant among women randomized to ILS or metformin. These patterns differed from those observed among women who did not use ET. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that among glucose-intolerant ET users, interventions to reduce glucose are effective but possibly mediated through different pathways than among women who do not use ET.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Among postmenopausal women who do not use estrogen therapy (ET), we have previously reported that intensive lifestyle modification (ILS) leads to increases in sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and that such increases are associated with reductions in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-hour postchallenge glucose (2HG). Oral ET decreases FPG and increases 2HG while increasing both SHBG and estradiol (E2). It is unknown if ILS reduces glucose among ET users, if changes in SHBG and E2 might mediate any glucose decreases in ET users, and if these patterns differ from those in non-ET users. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of postmenopausal women in the Diabetes Prevention Program who used ET at baseline and 1-year follow-up (n = 324) and who did not use ET at either time point (n = 382). Participants were randomized to ILS, metformin, or placebo administered at 850 mg BID. RESULTS: ET users were younger, more often white, and more likely to have had bilateral oophorectomy than non-ET users. Among ET users, ILS reduced FPG (P < 0.01) and 2HG (P < 0.01), and metformin reduced FPG (P < 0.01) but not 2HG (P = 0.56), compared with placebo. Associations between SHBG and total E2 with FPG and 2HG were not significant among women randomized to ILS or metformin. These patterns differed from those observed among women who did not use ET. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that among glucose-intolerant ET users, interventions to reduce glucose are effective but possibly mediated through different pathways than among women who do not use ET.
Authors: Richard F Hamman; Rena R Wing; Sharon L Edelstein; John M Lachin; George A Bray; Linda Delahanty; Mary Hoskin; Andrea M Kriska; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Judith Regensteiner; Beth Venditti; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Abbas E Kitabchi; Marinella Temprosa; William C Knowler; Steven E Kahn; Sarah E Fowler; Steven M Haffner; Reuben Andres; Christopher Saudek; Sharon L Edelstein; Richard Arakaki; Mary Beth Murphy; Harry Shamoon Journal: Diabetes Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Ying Zhang; Barbara V Howard; Linda D Cowan; Jeunliang Yeh; Carl F Schaefer; Robert A Wild; Wenyu Wang; Elisa T Lee Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: William C Knowler; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Sarah E Fowler; Richard F Hamman; John M Lachin; Elizabeth A Walker; David M Nathan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: I F Godsland; N A Manassiev; C V Felton; A J Proudler; D Crook; M I Whitehead; J C Stevenson Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Alka M Kanaya; David Herrington; Eric Vittinghoff; Feng Lin; Deborah Grady; Vera Bittner; Jane A Cauley; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Jacques E Rossouw; Garnet L Anderson; Ross L Prentice; Andrea Z LaCroix; Charles Kooperberg; Marcia L Stefanick; Rebecca D Jackson; Shirley A A Beresford; Barbara V Howard; Karen C Johnson; Jane Morley Kotchen; Judith Ockene Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rita Cervera-Juanes; Priscila Darakjian; Megan Ball; Steven G Kohama; Henryk F Urbanski Journal: Geroscience Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Catherine Kim; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; John F Randolph; Shengchun Kong; Bin Nan; Kieren J Mather; Sherita H Golden Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 5.002