Literature DB >> 23168414

Computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction without significant coronary stenosis.

Annachiara Aldrovandi1, Filippo Cademartiri, Daniele Arduini, Daniela Lina, Fabrizio Ugo, Erica Maffei, Alberto Menozzi, Chiara Martini, Alessandro Palumbo, Federico Bontardelli, Tiziano Gherli, Livia Ruffini, Diego Ardissino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is known that a significant number of patients experiencing an acute myocardial infarction have normal coronary arteries or nonsignificant coronary disease at coronary angiography (CA). Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) can identify the presence of plaques, even in the absence of significant coronary stenosis. This study evaluated the role of 64-slice CTCA in detecting and characterizing coronary atherosclerosis in these patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Consecutive patients with documented acute myocardial infarction but without significant coronary stenosis at CA underwent late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance and CTCA. Only the 50 patients with an area of myocardial infarction identified by late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance were included in the study. All of the coronary segments were assessed for the presence of plaques. CTCA identified 101 plaques against the 41 identified by CA: 61 (60.4%) located in infarct-related arteries (IRAs) and 40 (39.6%) in non-IRAs. In the IRAs, 22 plaques were noncalcified, 17 mixed, and 22 calcified; in the non-IRAs, 5 plaques were noncalcified, 8 mixed, and 27 calcified (P=0.005). Mean plaque area was greater in the IRAs than in the non-IRAs (6.1±5.4 mm(2) versus 4.2±2.1 mm(2); P=0.03); there was no significant difference in mean percentage stenosis (33.5%±14.6 versus 31.7%±12.2; P=0.59), but the mean remodeling index was significantly different (1.25±0.41 versus 1.08±0.21; P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: CTCA detects coronary plaques in nonstenotic coronary arteries that are underestimated by CA, and identifies a different distribution of plaque types in IRAs and non-IRAs. It may therefore be valuable for diagnosing coronary atherosclerosis in acute myocardial infarction patients without significant coronary stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23168414     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.117598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  12 in total

1.  Smoking gun theory: angiographically normal or mild coronary plaque as a cause of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jason C Kovacic; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Evidence of myocardial scarring and microvascular obstruction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a series of patients presenting with myocardial infarction without obstructed coronary arteries.

Authors:  Jeannine A J M Hermens; Jan van Es; Clemens von Birgelen; Jeroen W Op den Akker; Lodewijk J Wagenaar
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Imaging atherosclerosis and risk of plaque rupture.

Authors:  Eric A Osborn; Farouc A Jaffer
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  The change in high-sensitivity troponin-T as a risk factor for significant coronary stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Min Chul Kim; Seok Oh; Youngkeun Ahn; Keumyi Moon; Joon Ho Ahn; Dae Young Hyun; Kyung Hoon Cho; Doo Sun Sim; Young Joon Hong; Ju Han Kim; Myung Ho Jeong; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.884

5.  Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of 5 image sets of dual-energy computed tomography for detecting first-pass myocardial perfusion defects compared with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Wenhuan Li; Xiaolian Zhu; Jing Li; Cheng Peng; Nan Chen; Zhigang Qi; Qi Yang; Yan Gao; Yang Zhao; Kai Sun; Kuncheng Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Characteristics of patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) from the ARIAM-SEMICYUC registry: development of a score for predicting MINOCA.

Authors:  Daniel Ballesteros-Ortega; Oscar Martínez-González; Rafael Blancas Gómez-Casero; Manuel Quintana-Díaz; Eva de Miguel-Balsa; Carmen Martín-Parra; Blanca López-Matamala; Miriam Chana-García; M Ángeles Alonso-Fernández; Madián Manso-Álvarez
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2019-03-13

7.  Coronary plaque burden, as determined by cardiac computed tomography, in patients with myocardial infarction and angiographically normal coronary arteries compared to healthy volunteers: a prospective multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Elin B Brolin; Tomas Jernberg; Torkel B Brismar; Maria Daniel; Loghman Henareh; Jonaz Ripsweden; Per Tornvall; Kerstin Cederlund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Positron emission tomography of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque in man--a contemporary review.

Authors:  Sune F Pedersen; Anne Mette F Hag; Thomas L Klausen; Rasmus S Ripa; Rasmus P Bodholdt; Andreas Kjaer
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction and normal invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Georgios Panayi; Wouter G Wieringa; Joakim Alfredsson; Jörg Carlsson; Jan-Erik Karlsson; Anders Persson; Jan Engvall; Gabija Pundziute; Eva Swahn
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Complementary CT Coronary Angiography after Negative Selective Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  V Hamoir; P Borgies; X Hamoir; J Kirsch; M Dupont; S Kautbally
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 1.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.