Literature DB >> 23168389

Early follow-up outcomes of a new zero-profile implant used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Jinhao Miao1, Ye Shen, Yong Kuang, Lili Yang, Xinwei Wang, Yu Chen, Deyu Chen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Original article.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to analyze the primary efficacy and safety of a new zero-profile implant named Zero-P in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in Chinese population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF has become the preferred treatment for single-level or multilevel cervical degenerative disk disease. Most surgeons prefer to place an anterior plate to ensure the stability and prevent subsequent graft-related complications. However, the side effects of the anterior plate, such as soft tissue injury and dysphagia, are still unavoidable especially when multilevel fusion is observed with the patients. A new zero-profile interbody fusion device named Zero-P was developed. In China, the new device was first implemented by our department.
METHODS: A total of 89 patients of cervical degenerative disk disease were enrolled in this study prospectively and treated by ACDF from June 2010 to November 2010. There were 39 patients with a mean age of 50.3 years (range, 30-65 y) who had Zero-P implanted in the target segment. A total of 71 Zero-Ps were implanted. Another 50 patients, with a mean age of 52.6 (range, 38-70 y), had common cages implanted in the target segment with an anterior titanium plate. The mean follow-up time was 16.9 months, ranging from 12 to 20 months. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the visual analog scale (VAS) score before and after operations. Incidence of dysphagia-related symptoms was recorded. A cervical Cobb angle was measured as the acute angle constructed by lines going along the back of C2 and C7 vertebral body on the standing lateral cervical x-ray.
RESULTS: At 2-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up, the JOA scores significantly increased and the VAS scores decreased correspondently compared with preoperational measurements in both groups. The cervical Cobb angle had a significant correction when compared with that before the operation. The incidence of dysphagia in the Zero-P group was lower compared with that in the cage with plate group, and the symptom duration was much shorter.
CONCLUSIONS: The primary clinical and radiographic efficacies of Zero-P used in ACDF were satisfactory. The device could improve and maintain the cervical lordosis and disk height. The incidence of postoperative dysphagia was low. More patients and longer follow-up are demanded to confirm the results we have obtained in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23168389     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827a2812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  27 in total

1.  Meta-Analysis Comparing Zero-Profile Spacer and Anterior Plate in Anterior Cervical Fusion.

Authors:  Jun Dong; Meng Lu; Teng Lu; Baobao Liang; Junkui Xu; Jun Zhou; Hongjun Lv; Jie Qin; Xuan Cai; Sihua Huang; Haopeng Li; Dong Wang; Xijing He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Osamu Nemoto; Akira Kitada; Satoko Naitou; Atsuko Tachibana; Yuya Ito; Akira Fujikawa
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-05

3.  A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Yantao Zhao; Jiaguang Tang; Dongfeng Ren; Jidong Guo; Huadong Wang; Li Li; Shuxun Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Zero-profile anchored cage reduces risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with cage with plate fixation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  ShanWen Xiao; ZhuDe Liang; Wu Wei; JinPei Ning
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Zero-P: a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF. A single institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Dario Romano; Francesco Certo; Pietro Milone; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Risk factors and preventative measures of early and persistent dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jingwei Liu; Yong Hai; Nan Kang; Xiaolong Chen; Yangpu Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Sentinel sign in standalone anterior cervical fusion: Outcomes and fusion rate.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; Luai M Mustafa; Moawiah M Mustafa; Amala Benny; Jason A Seale
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-24

8.  Cervical Stand-Alone Polyetheretherketone Cage versus Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion : Minimum 2-Year Assessment of Radiographic and Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Hyun-Jun Cho; Junseok W Hur; Jang-Bo Lee; Jin-Sol Han; Tai-Hyoung Cho; Jung-Yul Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-08-28

9.  Zero-profile implant versus conventional cage-plate implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of degenerative cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haiyu Shao; Jinping Chen; Bin Ru; Feifei Yan; Jun Zhang; Shaonan Xu; Yazeng Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Comparison of zero-profile anchored spacer versus plate-cage construct in treatment of cervical spondylosis with regard to clinical outcomes and incidence of major complications: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weijun Liu; Ling Hu; Junwen Wang; Ming Liu; Xiaomei Wang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.