Literature DB >> 23167956

Visual mismatch negativity is sensitive to symmetry as a perceptual category.

Krisztina Kecskés-Kovács1, István Sulykos, István Czigler.   

Abstract

We investigated the sensitivity of visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) to an abstract and non-semantic category, vertical mirror symmetry. Event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by random and symmetric square patterns, delivered in passive oddball paradigm (participants played a video game), were recorded. In one of the conditions, symmetric patterns were frequent (standard) stimuli and the random patterns were infrequent (deviant) stimuli; in the other condition, the probabilities were reversed. We compared the ERPs elicited by symmetric stimuli as deviants and as standards, and, similarly, the ERPs elicited by the random deviants and random standards. As the difference between the ERPs elicited by random deviant and random standard stimuli, a posterior negativity emerged in two latency ranges (112-120 and 284-292 ms). These negativities were considered to be vMMN components. We suggest that the two vMMN components are organised in cascade error signals. However, there was no significant difference between the ERPs elicited by symmetric deviants and those elicited by symmetric standards. The emergence of vMMN in response to the deviant random stimuli is considered to be a deviation of a perceptual category (in the symmetric standard sequence presented). Accordingly, random stimuli acquired no perceptual category; for this reason, the symmetric deviant (in the random standard sequence presented) elicited no vMMN. The results show that the memory system underlying vMMN is capable of coding perceptual categories such as bilateral symmetry, even if the stimulus patterns are unrelated to the ongoing behavior.
© 2012 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23167956     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  15 in total

1.  The visual mismatch negativity elicited with visual speech stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin T Files; Edward T Auer; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Asymmetry of automatic change detection shown by the visual mismatch negativity: an additional feature is identified faster than missing features.

Authors:  István Czigler; István Sulykos; Krisztina Kecskés-Kovács
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.526

3.  A frontal attention mechanism in the visual mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Craig Hedge; George Stothart; Jenna Todd Jones; Priscila Rojas Frías; Kristopher Lundy Magee; Jonathan C W Brooks
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Is it a face of a woman or a man? Visual mismatch negativity is sensitive to gender category.

Authors:  Krisztina Kecskés-Kovács; István Sulykos; István Czigler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 5.  Visual mismatch negativity: a predictive coding view.

Authors:  Gábor Stefanics; Jan Kremláček; István Czigler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Object-related regularities are processed automatically: evidence from the visual mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Dagmar Müller; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Altered visual information processing systems in bipolar disorder: evidence from visual MMN and P3.

Authors:  Toshihiko Maekawa; Satomi Katsuki; Junji Kishimoto; Toshiaki Onitsuka; Katsuya Ogata; Takao Yamasaki; Takefumi Ueno; Shozo Tobimatsu; Shigenobu Kanba
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Oscillatory characteristics of the visual mismatch negativity: what evoked potentials aren't telling us.

Authors:  George Stothart; Nina Kazanina
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers.

Authors:  George Stothart; Olivia Maynard; Rosie Lavis; Marcus Munafò
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Improved Pre-attentive Processing With Occipital rTMS Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder Patients Revealed by MMN.

Authors:  Muzhen Guan; Xufeng Liu; Li Guo; Ruiguo Zhang; Qingrong Tan; Huaihai Wang; Huaning Wang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.