Literature DB >> 23167881

Keeping it real! Enhancing realism in standardised patient OSCE stations.

Gerry Gormley1, Margaret Sterling, Allison Menary, Gary McKeown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are a commonly used method of assessing clinical competency in health care education. They can provide an opportunity to observe candidates interacting with patients. There are many challenges in using real patients in OSCEs, and increasingly standardised patients are being used as a preference. However, by using standardised patients there is a risk of making the encounter artificial and removed from actual clinical practice. CONTEXT: Efforts made in terms of cognitive, auditory, visual, tactile, psychological and emotional cues can minimise the differences between a simulated and real clinical scenario. However, a number of factors, including feasibility, cost and usability, need to be considered if such techniques are to be practicable within an OSCE framework. INNOVATION: This article describes a series of techniques that have been used in our institution to enhance the realism of a standardised patient encounter in an OSCE. Efforts in preparing standardised patient roles, and how they portray these roles, will be considered. A wide variety of equipment can also be used in combination with a patient and the surrounding environment, which can further enhance the authenticity of the simulated scenario. IMPLICATIONS: By enhancing the realism in simulated patient OSCE encounters, there is potential to trigger more authentic conscious responses from candidates and implicit reactions that the candidates themselves may be less aware of. Furthermore, using such techniques may allow faculty members to select scenarios that were previously not thought possible in an OSCE. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23167881     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00626.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Teach        ISSN: 1743-4971


  7 in total

1.  [How can young academics be recruited? Acceptance and effects of urological practice-oriented training].

Authors:  A Hegele; H Heers; F Brüning; C Klapp; A Schönbauer; R Hofmann; T Stibane
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  The Benefits and Risks of Being a Standardized Patient: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joseph Plaksin; Joseph Nicholson; Sarita Kundrod; Sondra Zabar; Adina Kalet; Lisa Altshuler
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Improving Communication With Surrogate Decision-Makers: A Pilot Initiative.

Authors:  Ellen C Meltzer; Zhenzhen Shi; Alexandra Suppes; Jennifer E Hersh; Jay D Orlander; Aaron W Calhoun; Judy Tung; Lia Logio; Ruth Manna; Philip A Bialer; Cathleen A Acres; Joseph J Fins
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-08

4.  Virtual clinical assessment in medical education: an investigation of online conference technology.

Authors:  Harish Thampy; Sarah Collins; Elora Baishnab; Jess Grundy; Kurt Wilson; Timothy Cappelli
Journal:  J Comput High Educ       Date:  2022-04-21

5.  Learning to manage complexity through simulation: students' challenges and possible strategies.

Authors:  Gerard J Gormley; Tara Fenwick
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2016-06

Review 6.  Simulated consultations: a sociolinguistic perspective.

Authors:  Sarah Atkins; Celia Roberts; Kamila Hawthorne; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Ethical reasoning through simulation: a phenomenological analysis of student experience.

Authors:  Gareth Lewis; Melissa McCullough; Alexander P Maxwell; Gerard J Gormley
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.