Literature DB >> 23167519

Efficiency of molar distalization associated with second and third molar eruption stage.

Carlos Flores-Mir1, Lisa McGrath, Giseon Heo, Paul W Major.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of molar distalization associated with the second and third molar eruption stage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic computerized database search was conducted using several databases. Adaptations of the terms molar distalization and distalizing appliances were used. The reference lists of all the selected articles were also searched for any potential articles that might have been missed in the electronic search. The data provided in the selected publications were grouped and analyzed in terms of molar distalization with respect to various eruption stages of maxillary second and third molars.
RESULTS: Out of the 13 initially identified articles only four fulfilled the final selection criteria. Three of the four studies showed no statistical significance in linear molar distalization based on the eruptive stage of the second and/or third molars, while one study found that the amount of distal movement of the first molars was significantly greater in the group with unerupted second molars. Only one study found that the amount of molar tipping that occurred as a result of distalization was related to the eruption stage of the maxillary molars. Similarly, three of the four studies found that molar distalization time was not significantly affected by eruption of the second or third molars.
CONCLUSION: The effect of maxillary second and third molar eruption stage on molar distalization-both linear and angular distalization-appears to be minimal. This conclusion is only based on low-level of evidence clinical trials. The large variability in the outcomes should be considered clinically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23167519      PMCID: PMC8754030          DOI: 10.2319/081612-658.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  14 in total

1.  The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy.

Authors:  J J Hilgers
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1992-11

Review 2.  Distal movement of the maxillary molars.

Authors:  A A Gianelly
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation.

Authors:  F K Byloff; M A Darendeliler
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Palatal bar and lip bumper in nonextraction treatment.

Authors:  A Ten Hoeve
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1985-04

5.  Molar and incisor changes with Wilson rapid molar distalization.

Authors:  D S Muse; M J Fillman; W J Emmerson; R D Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.

Authors:  T J Bussick; J A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique.

Authors:  J Ghosh; R S Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Intraoral maxillary molar distalization.

Authors:  Ingela Karlsson; Lars Bondemark
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage.

Authors:  Gero S M Kinzinger; Ulrike B Fritz; Franz-Günter Sander; Peter R Diedrich
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sextant of Sapphires for Molar Distalization.

Authors:  Swaroopa Rani Ponnada; Yudistar Venkata Palla; Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-08-01

2.  Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.

Authors:  Alberto Caprioglio; Mauro Cozzani; Mattia Fontana
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.750

3.  Cone-beam computed tomography-guided three-dimensional evaluation of treatment effectiveness of the Frog appliance.

Authors:  Mujia Li; Xiaoxia Su; Yang Li; Xianglin Li; Xinqin Si
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Evaluation of long-term stability of mesiodistal axial inclinations of maxillary molars through panoramic radiographs in subjects treated with Pendulum appliance.

Authors:  Caroline Andrade Rocha; Renato Rodrigues de Almeida; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Carlos Flores-Mir; Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

5.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of molar distalization with a palatal plate, pendulum, and headgear according to molar eruption stage.

Authors:  Ju-Man Kang; Jae Hyun Park; Mohamed Bayome; Moonbee Oh; Chong Ook Park; Yoon-Ah Kook; Sung-Seo Mo
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.372

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.