Literature DB >> 23166062

Type 2 diabetes patients educated by other patients perform at least as well as patients trained by professionals.

Juan José Gagliardino1, Viviana Arrechea, Daniel Assad, Gabriel G Gagliardino, Lorena González, Soledad Lucero, Liliana Rizzuti, Zulma Zufriategui, Charles Clark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetes education can improve the quality of care of people with diabetes, but many organizations are not equipped to manage its implementation. Involving people with diabetes in the education process can overcome the problem. Thus, we compared clinical, metabolic and psychological outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes 1 year after attending a structured diabetes education programme implemented by professional educators versus the same programme implemented by trained peers with diabetes that also provided ongoing peer support.
METHODS: People with type 2 diabetes (25-75 years) were randomly assigned to attend a 4-week structured diabetes education course delivered by professional educators (control) or previously trained peers (peer). Peers also received continuing psychological support, including examples on how to apply diabetes knowledge in daily life via weekly peer cellular phone calls and bimonthly face-to-face interviews in small groups (ten patients), using a structured questionnaire related to the patient's clinical, metabolic and psychological progress. Identical outcome data from both groups were used for follow-up.
RESULTS: Both groups had a comparable positive effect on clinical, metabolic and psychological indicators immediately following the programme. Over the following year, peer-educated subjects had lower A(1C) and systolic blood pressure and showed higher adherence to physical activity and better control of hypoglycaemic episodes.
CONCLUSION: The non-inferiority of the peer outcomes and the mentioned improvements in this group suggest that volunteer trained peer educators and ongoing support can be successful. This approach provides an effective alternative method of education, especially in areas with limited availability of professionals and economic resources.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23166062     DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev        ISSN: 1520-7552            Impact factor:   4.876


  25 in total

1.  Contributions of Peer Support to Health, Health Care, and Prevention: Papers from Peers for Progress.

Authors:  Edwin B Fisher; Guadalupe X Ayala; Leticia Ibarra; Andrea L Cherrington; John P Elder; Tricia S Tang; Michele Heisler; Monika M Safford; David Simmons
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  A theoretical framework for a virtual diabetes self-management community intervention.

Authors:  Allison Vorderstrasse; Ryan J Shaw; Jim Blascovich; Constance M Johnson
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  The relationship between diabetes attitudes and treatment among free clinic patients and volunteers.

Authors:  Akiko Kamimura; Nancy Christensen; Maziar M Nourian; Kyl Myers; AnnMarie Saunders; Silvia P Solis; Jeanie Ashby; Jessica L J Greenwood; Justine J Reel
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-12

Review 4.  Effect of telemedicine on glycated hemoglobin in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Labib Imran Faruque; Natasha Wiebe; Arash Ehteshami-Afshar; Yuanchen Liu; Neda Dianati-Maleki; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Braden J Manns; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Peer Support Interventions for Adults With Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Hemoglobin A1c Outcomes.

Authors:  Sonal J Patil; Todd Ruppar; Richelle J Koopman; Erik J Lindbloom; Susan G Elliott; David R Mehr; Vicki S Conn
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  2022 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.

Authors:  Jody Davis; Amy Hess Fischl; Joni Beck; Lillian Browning; Amy Carter; Jo Ellen Condon; Michelle Dennison; Terri Francis; Peter J Hughes; Stephen Jaime; Ka Hei Karen Lau; Teresa McArthur; Karen McAvoy; Michelle Magee; Olivia Newby; Stephen W Ponder; Uzma Quraishi; Kelly Rawlings; Julia Socke; Michelle Stancil; Sacha Uelmen; Suzanne Villalobos
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2022-03-09

7.  Improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus through a peer support instant messaging service intervention (DiabPeerS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elisabeth Höld; Johanna Grüblbauer; Martin Wiesholzer; Daniela Wewerka-Kreimel; Stefan Stieger; Werner Kuschei; Philip Kisser; Elisabeth Gützer; Ursula Hemetek; Astrid Ebner-Zarl; Jürgen Pripfl
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.728

Review 8.  Public Policies and Interventions for Diabetes in Latin America: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kaselitz; Gurpreet K Rana; Michele Heisler
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  Peer Support for Diabetes Management in Primary Care and Community Settings in Anhui Province, China.

Authors:  Xuefeng Zhong; Zhimin Wang; Edwin B Fisher; Chanuantong Tanasugarn
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Patient and Staff Perceptions of Intradialytic Exercise before and after Implementation: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Hannah M L Young; Nicky Hudson; Amy L Clarke; Maurice Dungey; John Feehally; James O Burton; Alice C Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.