Literature DB >> 2316575

Blood exposure in single versus double gloving during pelvic surgery.

G M Cohn1, D B Seifer.   

Abstract

In light of continued reports suggesting the inadequacy of surgical gloves as sterile barriers, as well as an increasing number of reports describing intraoperative cross infections, a prospective study was performed comparing the presence of visible blood on the hands of surgeons wearing single or double gloves during 45 consecutive major obstetric and gynecologic operations. Single-gloved hands revealed the presence of visible blood in 38% of cases (n = 42) whereas visible blood was noted in only 2% of double-gloved hands (n = 48) (p less than 0.001). These results demonstrate that the sterile barrier between surgeon and patient was compromised intraoperatively and that particles the size of red blood cells were able to cross this barrier. In addition, these data suggest single gloving may be less than optimal in maintaining a sterile barrier, as well as strongly suggesting that double gloving can improve the integrity of the patient-surgeon sterile barrier during pelvic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2316575     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90992-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

1.  Double gloving and surgical technique.

Authors:  J M Webb; B D Pentlow
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.

Authors:  J Tanner; H Parkinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

3.  Reported use of strategies by surgeons to prevent transmission of bloodborne diseases.

Authors:  J G Wright; N L Young; D Stephens
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.