Literature DB >> 23165662

Screening for HIV: systematic review to update the 2005 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.

Roger Chou1, Shelley Selph, Tracy Dana, Christina Bougatsos, Bernadette Zakher, Ian Blazina, P Todd Korthuis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A 2005 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) review found good evidence that HIV screening is accurate and that antiretroviral therapy (ART) for immunologically advanced disease is associated with substantial clinical benefits, but insufficient evidence to determine the effects on transmission or in less immunologically advanced disease.
PURPOSE: To update the 2005 USPSTF review on benefits and harms of HIV screening in adolescents and adults, focusing on research gaps identified in the prior review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (2004 to June 2012) and the Cochrane Library (through the second quarter of 2012). STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials and observational studies that compared HIV screening strategies and reported clinical outcomes, evaluated the effects of starting ART at different CD4 cell count thresholds and long-term harms, or reported the effects of interventions on transmission risk. DATA EXTRACTION: 2 authors abstracted and checked study details and quality using predefined criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: No study directly evaluated the effects on clinical outcomes of screening versus no screening for HIV infection. A randomized trial and a subgroup analysis from a randomized trial found that ART initiation at CD4 counts less than 0.250 × 109 cells/L was associated with a higher risk for death or AIDS-defining events than initiation at CD4 counts greater than 0.350 × 109 cells/L (hazard ratios, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5] and 5.3 [CI, 1.3 to 9.6]). Large, fair-quality cohort studies also consistently found that ART initiation at CD4 counts of 0.350 to 0.500 × 109 cells/L was associated with lower risk for death or AIDS-defining events than delayed initiation. New evidence from good-quality cohorts with longer-term follow-up confirms a previously observed small increased risk for cardiovascular events associated with certain antiretrovirals. Strong evidence from 1 good-quality randomized trial and 7 observational studies found that ART was associated with a 10- to 20-fold reduction in risk for sexual transmission of HIV. LIMITATIONS: Only English-language articles were included. Observational studies were included. Studies done in resource-poor or high-prevalence settings were included but might have limited applicability to general screening in the United States.
CONCLUSION: Previous studies have shown that HIV screening is accurate, targeted screening misses a substantial proportion of cases, and treatments are effective in patients with advanced immunodeficiency. New evidence indicates that ART reduces risk for AIDS-defining events and death in persons with less advanced immunodeficiency and reduces sexual transmission of HIV. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23165662     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-10-201211200-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  8 in total

1.  "We Deserve Better!": Perceptions of HIV Testing Campaigns Among Black and Latino MSM in New York City.

Authors:  Kathryn Drumhiller; Ashley Murray; Zaneta Gaul; Tiffiany M Aholou; Madeline Y Sutton; Jose Nanin
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2017-04-25

2.  Expanded HIV Testing and Linkage to Care: Conventional vs. Point-of-Care Testing and Assignment of Patient Notification and Linkage to Care to an HIV Care Program.

Authors:  Sara Bares; Rebecca Eavou; Clara Bertozzi-Villa; Michelle Taylor; Heather Hyland; Rachel McFadden; Sachin Shah; Mai T Pho; James Walter; Sameer Badlani; John Schneider; Nik Prachand; Nanette Benbow; David Pitrak
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Routine HIV screening in North Carolina in the era of the Affordable Care Act: update on laws, reimbursement, and tests.

Authors:  Becky L White; Yvonne L Carter; Katherine Records; Ian B K Martin
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.954

4.  Recommendations for lab-based screening tests for adult women.

Authors:  Shahram Shahangian
Journal:  Adv Adm Lab       Date:  2014-08-04

5.  Understanding HIV screening in the emergency department: is perception reality?

Authors:  Jason S Haukoos; Emily Hopkins
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Missed Opportunities for HIV Testing of Patients Tested for Sexually Transmitted Infections at a Large Urban Health Care System From 2010 to 2015.

Authors:  Shashi N Kapadia; Harjot K Singh; Sian Jones; Samuel Merrick; Carlos M Vaamonde
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.835

7.  Population health challenges in primary care: What are the unfinished tasks and who should do them?

Authors:  Frederick North; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel; John C Matulis; Jennifer L Pecina; Andrew M Franqueira; Sarah S Johnson; Rajeev Chaudhry
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-09-17

8.  HIV screening in the emergency department: Thoughts on disparities and the next step in ending the epidemic.

Authors:  Jason Haukoos; Emily Hopkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-08-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.