Literature DB >> 23165616

Postoperative mortality after surgery for brain tumors by patient insurance status in the United States.

Eric N Momin, Hadie Adams, Russell T Shinohara, Constantine Frangakis, Henry Brem, Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether being uninsured is associated with higher in-hospital postoperative mortality when undergoing surgery in the United States for a brain tumor.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2008.
SETTING: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample contains all inpatient records from a stratified sample of 20% of hospitals in 37 states. PATIENTS: A total of 28,581 patients, aged 18 to 65 years, who underwent craniotomy for a brain tumor. Three groups were studied: Medicaid recipients and privately insured and uninsured patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was in-hospital postoperative death. Associations between this outcome and insurance status were examined within the full cohort and within the subset of patients with no comorbidity using Cox proportional hazards models. These models were stratified by hospital to control for any clustering effects that could arise from differing access to care.
RESULTS: In the unadjusted analysis, the mortality rate for privately insured patients was 1.3% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.4%) compared with 2.6% for uninsured patients (95% CI, 1.9%-3.3%; P < .001) and 2.3% for Medicaid recipients (95% CI, 1.8%-2.8%; P < .001). After adjusting for patient characteristics and stratifying by hospital in patients with no comorbidity, uninsured patients still had a higher risk of experiencing in-hospital death (hazard ratio, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.11-6.14; P = .03) compared with privately insured patients. In this adjusted analysis, the disparity was not conclusively present in Medicaid recipients (hazard ratio, 2.03; 95% CI, 0.97-4.23; P = .06).
CONCLUSIONS: Uninsured patients who underwent craniotomy for a brain tumor experienced the highest in-hospital mortality. Differences in overall health do not fully account for this disparity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23165616      PMCID: PMC3571758          DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.

Authors:  Danielle A Southern; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Physician utilization disparities between the uninsured and insured. Comparisons of the chronically ill, acutely ill, and well nonelderly populations.

Authors:  C Hafner-Eaton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview.

Authors:  A R Localio; J A Berlin; T R Ten Have; S E Kimmel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Comparison of the performance of two comorbidity measures, with and without information from prior hospitalizations.

Authors:  G J Stukenborg; D P Wagner; A F Connors
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Effects of health insurance and race on breast carcinoma treatments and outcomes.

Authors:  R G Roetzheim; E C Gonzalez; J M Ferrante; N Pal; D J Van Durme; J P Krischer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors in the United States, 1996-2000: mortality, morbidity, and the effects of hospital and surgeon volume.

Authors:  Fred G Barker; Anne Klibanski; Brooke Swearingen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Health insurance and mortality. Evidence from a national cohort.

Authors:  P Franks; C M Clancy; M R Gold
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Payer status is related to differences in access and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States.

Authors:  Leslie K Boxer; Justin B Dimick; Reid M Wainess; John A Cowan; Peter K Henke; James C Stanley; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  The healthcare cost and utilization project: an overview.

Authors:  Claudia Steiner; Anne Elixhauser; Jenny Schnaier
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2002 May-Jun

10.  Insurance-related differences in the risk of ruptured appendix.

Authors:  P Braveman; V M Schaaf; S Egerter; T Bennett; W Schecter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-08-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  13 in total

1.  Disparities in health care determine prognosis in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ankush Chandra; Jonathan W Rick; Cecilia Dalle Ore; Darryl Lau; Alan T Nguyen; Diego Carrera; Alexander Bonte; Annette M Molinaro; Philip V Theodosopoulos; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Influence of insurance status and income in anaplastic astrocytoma: an analysis of 4325 patients.

Authors:  Jacob Y Shin; Ja Kyoung Yoon; Aidnag Z Diaz
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Initial care and outcome of glioblastoma multiforme patients in 2 diverse health care scenarios in Brazil: does public versus private health care matter?.

Authors:  Luiz Victor Maia Loureiro; Lucíola de Barros Pontes; Donato Callegaro-Filho; Ludmila de Oliveira Koch; Eduardo Weltman; Elivane da Silva Victor; Adrialdo José Santos; Lia Raquel Rodrigues Borges; Roberto Araújo Segreto; Suzana Maria Fleury Malheiros
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Tracheostomy risk factors and outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Stephen S Humble; Laura D Wilson; John W McKenna; Taylor C Leath; Yanna Song; Mario A Davidson; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Pratik P Pandharipande; Mayur B Patel
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Predicting access to postoperative treatment after glioblastoma resection: an analysis of neighborhood-level disadvantage using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI).

Authors:  Krissia M Rivera Perla; Oliver Y Tang; Shayla N M Durfey; Tito Vivas-Buitrago; Wendy J Sherman; Ian Parney; Joon H Uhm; Alyx B Porter; Heinrich Elinzano; Steven A Toms; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Brain tumor craniotomy outcomes for dual-eligible medicare and medicaid patients: a 10-year nationwide analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Y Tang; Ross A Clarke; Krissia M Rivera Perla; Kiara M Corcoran Ruiz; Steven A Toms; Robert J Weil
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Complications following primary and revision transsphenoidal surgeries for pituitary tumors.

Authors:  James G Krings; Dorina Kallogjeri; Andre Wineland; Kenneth G Nepple; Jay F Piccirillo; Anne E Getz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  The impact of insurance status on the outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Pui Man Rosalind Lai; Hormuzdiyar Dasenbrock; Ning Lin; Rose Du
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Insurance status is associated with treatment allocation and outcomes after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Charles Hobson; John Dortch; Tezcan Ozrazgat Baslanti; Daniel R Layon; Alina Roche; Alison Rioux; Jeffrey S Harman; Brenda Fahy; Azra Bihorac
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Surgery for CNS Tumors in the Brazilian National Health Care System.

Authors:  Luciola Pontes; Maryam Nemati Shafaee; Benjamin Haaland; Gilberto Lopes
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2016-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.