Literature DB >> 2316561

Clinical assessment of central venous pressure in the critically ill.

D J Cook1.   

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of central venous pressure (CVP) assessment in critically ill patients, and measure disagreement amongst clinicians, 50 consecutive intensive care unit (ICU) patients with right internal jugular catheters were examined. CVP was measured by the indwelling catheter, and was assessed by: (1) one of three ICU staff physicians, (2) one of six medical residents, and (3) one of six medical students. There was no significant difference in CVP assessment between medical students, residents, and staff physicians. Although all clinicians tended to underestimate CVP, only the residents did so significantly (p less than 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity, and agreement and correlation between the clinicians' assessment and catheter measurements were higher when ventilated patients were excluded. All clinicians agreed more often and were better at identifying low CVP. In summary, considerable disagreement and inaccuracy exists in the clinical assessment of central venous pressure in critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2316561     DOI: 10.1097/00000441-199003000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  18 in total

1.  Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic).

Authors:  Thomas McGinn; Peter C Wyer; Thomas B Newman; Sheri Keitz; Rosanne Leipzig; Gordon Guyatt For
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  A comparison of visual and quantitative assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction by cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Cameron J Holloway; Lindsay M Edwards; Oliver J Rider; Angela Fast; Kieran Clarke; Jane M Francis; Saul G Myerson; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  IVC measurement for the noninvasive evaluation of central venous pressure.

Authors:  Max Ruge; Gregary D Marhefka
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Interobserver reliability of urine sediment interpretation.

Authors:  Ron Wald; Chaim M Bell; Rosane Nisenbaum; Samuel Perrone; Orfeas Liangos; Andreas Laupacis; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Can peripheral venous pressure be interchangeable with central venous pressure in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?

Authors:  Roger Desjardins; André Y Denault; Sylvain Bélisle; Michel Carrier; Denis Babin; Sylvie Lévesque; Raymond Martineau
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  What is the evidence base for fluid resuscitation in acute medicine? .

Authors:  Adam Seccombe; Elizabeth Sapey
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 7.  Point of care cardiac ultrasound applications in the emergency department and intensive care unit--a review.

Authors:  Robert T Arntfield; Scott J Millington
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2012-05

8.  Non-invasive method for the rapid assessment of central venous pressure: description and validation by a single examiner.

Authors:  Jeffrey Sankoff; Arnold Zidulka
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-11

Review 9.  Bedside ultrasonography: Applications in critical care: Part I.

Authors:  Jose Chacko; Gagan Brar
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-05

10.  Effect of an Early Resuscitation Protocol on In-hospital Mortality Among Adults With Sepsis and Hypotension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ben Andrews; Matthew W Semler; Levy Muchemwa; Paul Kelly; Shabir Lakhi; Douglas C Heimburger; Chileshe Mabula; Mwango Bwalya; Gordon R Bernard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.