Literature DB >> 23165277

The attributes of the clinical trainer as a role model: a systematic review.

H G A Ria Jochemsen-van der Leeuw1, Nynke van Dijk, Faridi S van Etten-Jamaludin, Margreet Wieringa-de Waard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Medical trainees (interns and residents) and their clinical trainers need to be aware of the differences between positive and negative role modeling to ensure that trainees imitate and that trainers demonstrate the professional behavior required to provide high-quality patient care. The authors systematically reviewed the medical and medical education literature to identify the attributes characterizing clinical trainers as positive and negative role models for trainees.
METHOD: The authors searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, and PsycINFO databases from their earliest dates until May 2011. They included quantitative and qualitative original studies, published in any language, on role modeling by clinical trainers for trainees in graduate medical education. They assessed the methodological quality of and extracted data from the included studies, using predefined forms.
RESULTS: Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria. The authors divided attributes of role models into three categories: patient care qualities, teaching qualities, and personal qualities. Positive role models were frequently described as excellent clinicians who were invested in the doctor-patient relationship. They inspired and taught trainees while carrying out other tasks, were patient, and had integrity. These findings confirm the implicit nature of role modeling. Positive role models' appearance and scientific achievements were among their least important attributes. Negative role models were described as uncaring toward patients, unsupportive of trainees, cynical, and impatient.
CONCLUSIONS: The identified attributes may help trainees recognize which aspects of the clinical trainer's professional behavior to imitate, by adding the important step of apperception to the process of learning professional competencies through observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23165277     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318276d070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  35 in total

1.  The Selling of Primary Care 2015.

Authors:  Walter N Kernan; D Michael Elnicki; Karen E Hauer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Cross-cultural Comparison of Pharmacy Students' Attitudes, Knowledge, Practice, and Barriers Regarding Evidence-based Medicine.

Authors:  Aya F Ozaki; Sari Nakagawa; Cynthia A Jackevicius
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Role modeling in family medicine.

Authors:  Francine Lemire
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4. 

Authors:  Francine Lemire
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Expanding The Rubric of "Patient-Centered Care" (PCC) to "Patient and Professional Centered Care" (PPCC) to Enhance Provider Well-Being.

Authors:  Stephen G Post; Michael Roess
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-12

6.  [Surgery as specialization for female physicians: Results from course evaluations and alumni studies at MHH].

Authors:  V Paulmann; V Fischer; A Dudzinska; R Pabst
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Those Who Teach, Can Do: Characterizing the Relationship Between Teaching and Clinical Skills in a Residency Program.

Authors:  C Christopher Smith; Lori R Newman; Grace C Huang
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-08

8.  Assessing Family Medicine Residents' Preparedness for the Practice of Geriatric Care.

Authors:  Emily Ingram; Owen Dunkley; Karen Willoughby; Mark Yaffe; Charo Rodríguez
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2019-05-31

9.  Clinical teachers' perceptions of role modeling: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elaheh Mohammadi; Azim Mirzazadeh; Hooman Shahsavari; Amir Ali Sohrabpour
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Qualitative study about the ways teachers react to feedback from resident evaluations.

Authors:  Thea van Roermund; Marie-Louise Schreurs; Henk Mokkink; Ben Bottema; Albert Scherpbier; Chris van Weel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.