Literature DB >> 23164998

Mandibular reconstruction using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing: an analysis of surgical results.

Benjamin D Foley1, Wesly P Thayer, Adam Honeybrook, Samuel McKenna, Steven Press.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy of virtual surgical planning in mandibular reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study involving 8 consecutive patients reconstructed with nonvascularized iliac crest bone grafts and free fibula osteomyocutaneous flaps. DICOM data from a maxillofacial skeleton computed tomography (CT) scan were sent to a medical modeling company and used to map the mandibular resection, anatomically place the mandibular reconstruction plate, and create surgical guides. After surgery a postoperative CT compared the virtual plan to the surgical result. Linear measurements [2 transverse and 1 anterior-posterior (A-P)] were performed to determine if the virtual surgical result was achieved. The transverse measurements were made from the condylar head to condylar head and from the gonial angle to gonial angle. The A-P analysis was made by measuring a perpendicular line drawn from the anterior inferior mandibular border to the center point on the condylar head to condylar head measurement.
RESULTS: The average surgical error in the A-P dimension for the iliac crest bone grafts and free fibula flap was 0.2 mm (range 0.0 mm to 0.7 mm) and 0.9 mm (range 0.2 mm to 1.9 mm), respectively. In the transverse dimension the average surgical error was 1.6 mm (range 0.7 mm to 2.4 mm) and 2.7 mm (range 1.9 mm to 4.5 mm) from condyle to condyle, and 1.7 mm (range 0.7 mm to 2.7 mm) and 2.5 mm (range 0.4 to 4.8 mm) from gonial angle to gonial angle.
CONCLUSION: The use of CAD-CAM (Medical Modeling, Golden, Colorado) technology for the fabrication of surgical resection guides and mandibular reconstruction plates resulted in an accurate surgical result.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23164998     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  35 in total

1.  [Application of computer-assisted design for anterolateral thigh flap in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction].

Authors:  S J Wang; W B Zhang; Y Yu; X Y Xie; H Y Yang; X Peng
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

Review 2.  Mandibular Reconstruction: Overview.

Authors:  Batchu Pavan Kumar; V Venkatesh; K A Jeevan Kumar; B Yashwanth Yadav; S Ram Mohan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-04-19

3.  Virtual planning of complex head and neck reconstruction results in satisfactory match between real outcomes and virtual models.

Authors:  Henning Hanken; Clemens Schablowsky; Ralf Smeets; Max Heiland; Susanne Sehner; Björn Riecke; Ibrahim Nourwali; Oliver Vorwig; Alexander Gröbe; Ahmed Al-Dam
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Harvey Chim; Nicholas Wetjen; Samir Mardini
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Reconstruction of the maxilla using a fibula graft and virtual planning techniques.

Authors:  Kristian Rude; Torben H Thygesen; Jens Ahm Sørensen
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-14

6.  Planning of mandibular reconstructions based on statistical shape models.

Authors:  Stefan Raith; Sebastian Wolff; Timm Steiner; Ali Modabber; Michael Weber; Frank Hölzle; Horst Fischer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Virtual modeling, stereolithography, and intraoperative CT guidance for the optimization of sagittal synostosis reconstruction: a technical note.

Authors:  Andrew J Kobets; Adam Ammar; Jonathan Nakhla; Aleka Scoco; Rani Nasser; James T Goodrich; Rick Abbott
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning.

Authors:  G Succo; M Berrone; B Battiston; P Tos; F Goia; P Appendino; E Crosetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Advantages of surgical simulation in the surgical reconstruction of oncological patients.

Authors:  F Iglesias-Martín; L-G Oliveros-López; A Fernández-Olavarría; M-A Serrera-Figallo; A Gutiérrez-Corrales; D Torres-Lagares; J-L Gutiérrez-Pérez
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-09-01

10.  Computer-assisted versus traditional freehand technique in fibular free flap mandibular reconstruction: a morphological comparative study.

Authors:  Thibault De Maesschalck; Delphine S Courvoisier; Paolo Scolozzi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.