Literature DB >> 23164925

Provision of cancer information as a "support for navigating the knowledge landscape": findings from a critical interpretive literature synthesis.

Karolina A Kazimierczak1, Zoë C Skea, Mary Dixon-Woods, Vikki A Entwistle, Deb Feldman-Stewart, James M O N'dow, Sara J MacLennan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH: Information is often seen as a crucial tool for the support of cancer patients, facilitating their involvement in care management and in decision-making. The importance of theory in guiding provision of cancer information has been widely accepted, but there is a growing need for critical reflection on the concepts underlying approaches to information provision. This paper presents findings from a critical review of literature related to information in cancer care.
METHODS: Critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) was employed to review and synthesise published literature. 57 publications were selected in a multi-step systematic process. Their content was analysed and synthesised using established methodology consistent with primary qualitative research. KEY
RESULTS: The synthesis identified and characterised a concept of cancer information provision as a "support for navigating the knowledge landscape". This concept recognises the diverse, changing and relational nature of patients' values, needs and preferences. It promotes a view of information provision as an ongoing and flexible process of navigating different resources, which in turn support the navigation of patients' broader experiences of their health and care. This process recognises various levels of patient involvement with healthcare services, and ensures timely provision of selected and personally relevant information.
CONCLUSION: The concept of "support for navigating the knowledge landscape" offers a useful way of envisaging information services for people with cancer (and possibly also with other chronic illnesses), which would be responsive to patients' needs and preferences.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23164925     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 1462-3889            Impact factor:   2.398


  9 in total

Review 1.  Prostate Cancer Patient Perspectives on the Use of Information in Treatment Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Sujane Kandasamy; Ahmad Firas Khalid; Umair Majid; Meredith Vanstone
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-05-01

Review 2.  Unmet psychosocial needs in haematological cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Swash; N Hulbert-Williams; R Bramwell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Factors that influence patients' views on treatment decision-making in localised kidney cancer.

Authors:  Katharina Beyer; Ravi Barod; David Nicol; Muddassar Hussain; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Netty Kinsella
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

4.  Self-management of patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review of experiences and attitudes.

Authors:  Sophie I van Dongen; Kim de Nooijer; Jane M Cramm; Anneke L Francke; Wendy H Oldenmenger; Ida J Korfage; Frederika E Witkamp; Rik Stoevelaar; Agnes van der Heide; Judith Ac Rietjens
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  How Do We Meet the Supportive Care and Information Needs of Those Living With and Beyond Bladder Cancer?

Authors:  Sara Jane MacLennan; Steven MacLennan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Use of the supportive care framework to explore haematological cancer survivors' unmet needs: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne Herrmann; Elise Mansfield; Flora Tzelepis; Marita Lynagh; Alix Hall
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Health systems guidance appraisal--a critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Denis E Ako-Arrey; Melissa C Brouwers; John N Lavis; Mita K Giacomini
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Olga Perski; Ann Blandford; Robert West; Susan Michie
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Creation and provision of a question and answer resource for esophageal cancer based on medical professionals' reports of patients' and families' views and preferences.

Authors:  Yasushi Toh; Yoji Inoue; Masayo Hayakawa; Chikako Yamaki; Hiroya Takeuchi; Masaichi Ohira; Hisahiro Matsubara; Yuichiro Doki; Fumihiko Wakao; Tomoko Takayama
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.230

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.