Literature DB >> 23164534

Patients with low compared with high body mass index gain more weight after implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Sitaramesh Emani1, Robert J Brewer, Ranjit John, Mark S Slaughter, David E Lanfear, Yazhini Ravi, Kartik S Sundareswaran, David J Farrar, Chittoor B Sai-Sudhakar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patterns of weight change after implantation of a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) can affect transplant candidacy and may influence outcomes. We evaluated changes in weight over a 24-month period from a national LVAD clinical trial database.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 896 patients enrolled into the HeartMate II Clinical trials for bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy from March 2005 to January 2009. The patients were divided into 4 groups: underweight (body mass index [BMI] <18.5 [kg/m(2)]); normal (BMI 18.5 to 29.9); obese (BMI 30 to 34.9); and extremely obese (BMI ≥ 35). Baseline BMI was compared with BMI at 6 months and 24 months after implant. BMI change >10% of baseline was considered clinically significant.
RESULTS: At 6 months, underweight and normal-weight patients had significant increases in BMI, with effects sustained up to 24 months (p < 0.01). Underweight patients gained weight most often, with 75% showing clinically meaningful weight gain at 24 months. Obese and extremely obese patients, in contrast, did not experience weight change over the same period. Pre-albumin levels improved from baseline to 6 months in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Underweight and normal-weight patients had an increase in BMI after LVAD implantation, and these changes persisted through 24 months. The BMIs of obese and extremely obese patients remained unchanged. Nutritional status improved in all groups.
Copyright © 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23164534     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  10 in total

1.  Impact of Obesity on Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes.

Authors:  Abhishek Jaiswal; Lauren K Truby; Astha Chichra; Rashmi Jain; Leann Myers; Nirav Patel; Veli K Topkara
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 5.712

2.  Can a Left Ventricular Assist Device in Individuals with Advanced Systolic Heart Failure Improve or Reverse Frailty?

Authors:  Mathew S Maurer; Evelyn Horn; Alex Reyentovich; Victoria Vaughan Dickson; Sean Pinney; Deena Goldwater; Nathan E Goldstein; Omar Jimenez; Sergio Teruya; Jeff Goldsmith; Stephen Helmke; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Gordon R Reeves
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Skeletal Muscle Mass Recovery Early After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients With Advanced Systolic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Amanda R Vest; William W Wong; Joronia Chery; Alex Coston; Laura Telfer; Matthew Lawrence; Didjana Celkupa; Michael S Kiernan; Gregory Couper; Masashi Kawabori; Edward Saltzman
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 10.447

4.  Isolated left ventricular assist device implantation produces variable changes to patient body mass index.

Authors:  Sonal R Chandratre; Nathan J Smith; Richard W Walsh; Tammy L Kindel; Sakthi K Sundararajan; David L Joyce; Asim Mohammed
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.663

5.  Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Heart Transplant Status in 4 Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Christopher T Ryan; Adriana Santiago; Nabil Tariq; Harveen K Lamba
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-08-01

6.  Effect of left ventricular assist device implantation and heart transplantation on habitual physical activity and quality of life.

Authors:  Djordje G Jakovljevic; Adam McDiarmid; Kate Hallsworth; Petar M Seferovic; Vladan M Ninkovic; Gareth Parry; Stephan Schueler; Michael I Trenell; Guy A MacGowan
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Relationship between muscle strength and rehospitalization in ventricular assist device patients.

Authors:  Kiyonori Kobayashi; Masato Mutsuga; Akihiko Usui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Ventricular assist device implantation improves skeletal muscle function, oxidative capacity, and growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 axis signaling in patients with advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Tuba Khawaja; Aalap Chokshi; Ruiping Ji; Tomoko S Kato; Katherine Xu; Cynthia Zizola; Christina Wu; Daniel E Forman; Takeyoshi Ota; Peter Kennel; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Isaac George; Donna Mancini; Christian P Schulze
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 12.910

9.  Cardiac cachexia in cats with congestive heart failure: Prevalence and clinical, laboratory, and survival findings.

Authors:  Sasha L Santiago; Lisa M Freeman; John E Rush
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Implications of obesity across the heart failure continuum.

Authors:  Andrew Elagizi; Salvatore Carbone; Carl J Lavie; Mandeep R Mehra; Hector O Ventura
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 8.194

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.