Literature DB >> 23163788

Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search.

Matthew S Cain1, Stephen R Mitroff.   

Abstract

Multiple-target visual searches--when more than 1 target can appear in a given search display--are commonplace in radiology, airport security screening, and the military. Whereas 1 target is often found accurately, additional targets are more likely to be missed in multiple-target searches. To better understand this decrement in 2nd-target detection, here we examined 2 potential forms of interference that can arise from finding a 1st target: interference from the perceptual salience of the 1st target (a now highly relevant distractor in a known location) and interference from a newly created memory representation for the 1st target. Here, we found that removing found targets from the display or making them salient and easily segregated color singletons improved subsequent search accuracy. However, replacing found targets with random distractor items did not improve subsequent search accuracy. Removing and highlighting found targets likely reduced both a target's visual salience and its memory load, whereas replacing a target removed its visual salience but not its representation in memory. Collectively, the current experiments suggest that the working memory load of a found target has a larger effect on subsequent search accuracy than does its perceptual salience. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23163788     DOI: 10.1037/a0030726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  12 in total

1.  Introduction to the special issue on visual working memory.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Satisfaction in motion: Subsequent search misses are more likely in moving search displays.

Authors:  Cary Stothart; Andrew Clement; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

3.  Visual search in breast imaging.

Authors:  Ziba Gandomkar; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Attentional avoidance of threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-11

5.  The importance of search strategy for finding targets in open terrain.

Authors:  Charlotte A Riggs; Katherine Cornes; Hayward J Godwin; Simon P Liversedge; Richard Guest; Nick Donnelly
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-02-20

Review 6.  Use-inspired basic research in medical image perception.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-11-14

7.  The Role of Working Memory in Dual-Target Visual Search.

Authors:  Elena S Gorbunova; Kirill S Kozlov; Sofia Tkhan Tin Le; Ivan M Makarov
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-07-31

Review 8.  Using Eye Movements to Understand how Security Screeners Search for Threats in X-Ray Baggage.

Authors:  Nick Donnelly; Alex Muhl-Richardson; Hayward J Godwin; Kyle R Cave
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-04

9.  Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search.

Authors:  Stephen H Adamo; Justin M Ericson; Joseph C Nah; Rachel Brem; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-14

10.  No Effect of the Right Posterior Parietal Cortex tDCS in Dual-Target Visual Search.

Authors:  Alyona A Lanina; Matteo Feurra; Elena S Gorbunova
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.