Literature DB >> 23163528

Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of predators in complex ecosystems.

Nessa E O'Connor1, Mark C Emmerson, Tasman P Crowe, Ian Donohue.   

Abstract

1. Global declines in biodiversity have stimulated much research into the consequences of species loss for ecosystems and the goods and services they provide. Species at higher trophic levels are at greater risk of human-induced extinction yet remarkably little is known about the effects of consumer species loss across multiple trophic levels in natural complex ecosystems. Previous studies have been criticized for lacking experimental realism and appropriate temporal scale, running for short periods that are not sufficient to detect many of the mechanisms operating in the field. 2. We manipulated the presence of two predator species and two groups of their prey (primary consumers) and measured their independent and interactive effects on primary producers in a natural marine benthic system. The presence of predators and their prey was manipulated in the field for 14 months to distinguish clearly the direct and indirect effects of predators on primary producers and to identify mechanisms driving responses. 3. We found that the loss of either predator species had indirect negative effects on species diversity and total cover of primary producers. These cascading effects of predator species loss were mediated by the presence of intermediate consumers. Moreover, the presence of different intermediate consumers, irrespective of the presence or absence of their predators, determined primary producer assemblage structure. We identified direct negative effects of predators on their prey and several indirect effects of predators on primary producers but not all interactions could have been predicted based on trophic level. 4. Our findings demonstrate the importance of trophic cascade effects coupled with non-trophic interactions when predicting the effects of loss of predator species on primary producers and consequently for ecosystem functioning. There is a pressing need for improved understanding of the effects of loss of consumers, based on realistic scenarios of diversity loss, to test conceptual frameworks linking predator diversity to variation in ecosystem functioning and for the protection of biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and related services.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algae; assemblage structure; biodiversity; crabs; ecosystem functioning; field experiment; grazers; mussels; trophic cascade; whelks

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23163528     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  7 in total

1.  Individual species provide multifaceted contributions to the stability of ecosystems.

Authors:  Lydia White; Nessa E O'Connor; Qiang Yang; Mark C Emmerson; Ian Donohue
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Single gene locus changes perturb complex microbial communities as much as apex predator loss.

Authors:  Deirdre McClean; Luke McNally; Letal I Salzberg; Kevin M Devine; Sam P Brown; Ian Donohue
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Interspecies Interactions Reverse the Hazard of Antibiotics Exposure: A Plankton Community Study on Responses to Ciprofloxacin hydrochloride.

Authors:  Changyou Wang; Ziyang Wang; Yong Zhang; Rongguo Su
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The Importance of Marine Predators in the Provisioning of Ecosystem Services by Coastal Plant Communities.

Authors:  Trisha B Atwood; Edd Hammill
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Positive and negative effects of mesograzers on early-colonizing species in an intertidal rocky-shore community.

Authors:  Daniela Tejada-Martinez; Daniela N López; César C Bonta; Roger D Sepúlveda; Nelson Valdivia
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Apparent competition drives community-wide parasitism rates and changes in host abundance across ecosystem boundaries.

Authors:  Carol M Frost; Guadalupe Peralta; Tatyana A Rand; Raphael K Didham; Arvind Varsani; Jason M Tylianakis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Habitat with small inter-structural spaces promotes mussel survival and reef generation.

Authors:  Camilla Bertolini; W I Montgomery; Nessa E O'Connor
Journal:  Mar Biol       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.573

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.