Literature DB >> 23163106

Reducing preanalytical laboratory sample errors through educational and technological interventions.

Rosa Lillo1, María Salinas, Maite Lopez-Garrigos, Yurena Naranjo-Santana, Mercedes Gutiérrez, Maria Dolores Marín, Manuel Miralles, Joaquín Uris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A correct preanalytical phase procedure is critical to get an adequate sample and consequently to achieve the most reliable laboratory results, promoting patient safety. Continuous laboratory staff changes create the need to establish improvement strategies to reduce the error risk. The objective was to show how the numbers of preanalytical errors related to unsuitable samples in a hospital setting decrease following two improvement strategies related to new technology and educational actions and how their effects were measured by monitoring indicators.
METHODS: Samples were drawn by the laboratory and other hospital departments' nurses without previous patient appointment, therefore, prior tube preparation was not available before the phlebotomy. Corrective measures for these activities were established: educational program for nurses and a system of custom labels, which correlate each laboratory test in the Laboratory Information System (LIS) with the corresponding tube. Three phases were defined based on the implementation dates of the improvement actions to be assessed. The set of indicators designed to monitor the improvement related to clotted, hemolyzed, insufficient, and uncollected samples. Data were collected and indicators calculated from the LIS using a data warehouse application. Patient satisfaction with respect to phlebotomy was also measured annually using a scoring survey.
RESULTS: There was a reduction in all types of preanalytical sample errors related to the improvement strategies adopted. The indicators demonstrated that the unavailable, insufficient, and clotted samples decreased between two- and three-fold, whereas hemolysis errors benefited more from these improvement strategies. Patient satisfaction with the laboratory and phlebotomy procedures improved over the past several years as based on the annual satisfaction surveys.
CONCLUSIONS: The educational program for nursing personnel is relevant and important as can be seen in the decrease of sample errors and the resulting quality improvement. The custom label system minimizes the potential oversight of forgetting to draw a tube, which happens frequently when operating without appointments, by printing the labels according to requested tests. Detection, identification, and monitoring of the error and implementing strategies to improve preanalytical quality reduces error numbers and thereby improves patient safety and health system outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23163106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lab        ISSN: 1433-6510            Impact factor:   1.138


  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of an intervention to improve blood culture practices: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  P Pavese; M Maillet; V Vitrat-Hincky; C Recule; J-P Vittoz; A Guyomard; A Seigneurin; P François
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Impact of Educational Activities in Reducing Pre-Analytical Laboratory Errors: A quality initiative.

Authors:  Hamed Al-Ghaithi; Anil Pathare; Sahimah Al-Mamari; Rodrigo Villacrucis; Naglaa Fawaz; Salam Alkindi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2017-10-10

3.  Ten years of preanalytical monitoring and control: Synthetic Balanced Score Card Indicator.

Authors:  Maria Salinas; Maite López-Garrigós; Emilio Flores; Ana Santo-Quiles; Mercedes Gutierrez; Javier Lugo; Rosa Lillo; Carlos Leiva-Salinas
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 4.  Laboratory Diagnostics and Quality of Blood Collection.

Authors:  Gabriel Lima-Oliveira; Giuseppe Lippi; Gian Luca Salvagno; Geraldo Picheth; Gian Cesare Guidi
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Indications for laboratory tests in primary care: assessment of the most frequent indications and requests with blank clinical information.

Authors:  Maria Salinas; Maite López-Garrigós; Emilio Flores; Maria Leiva-Salinas; Patricia Esteban; Miguel Ahumada; Carlos Leiva-Salinas
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 6.  Phlebotomy, a bridge between laboratory and patient.

Authors:  Cristiano Ialongo; Sergio Bernardini
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.313

7.  Pre-Test and Post-Test Applications to Shape the Education of Phlebotomists in A Quality Management Program: An Experience in a Training Hospital.

Authors:  Güzin Aykal; Mustafa Keşapli; Özgür Aydin; Hatice Esen; Ayşenur Yeğin; Faruk Güngör; Necat Yilmaz
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  The effective reduction of tourniquet application time after minor modification of the CLSI H03-A6 blood collection procedure.

Authors:  Gabriel Lima-Oliveira; Giuseppe Lippi; Gian Luca Salvagno; Martina Montagnana; Geraldo Picheth; Gian Cesare Guidi
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.313

9.  Specimen rejection in laboratory medicine: Necessary for patient safety?

Authors:  Zeliha Gunnur Dikmen; Asli Pinar; Filiz Akbiyik
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

10.  Hemolysis from a nurses' standpoint--survey from four Croatian hospitals.

Authors:  Adrijana Dorotić; Dragana Antončić; Vanja Radišić Biljak; Dara Nedić; Andjelo Beletić
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.