Literature DB >> 23162962

A comparison of external fixation alone or combined with intramedullary nailing in the treatment of segmental tibial defects.

Levent Eralp1, Mehmet Kocaoğlu, Gökhan Polat, Ali Baş, Ahmet Dirican, Mohsin-E Azam.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of external fixation alone versus external fixation combined with intramedullary nailing in the reconstruction of segmental defects of the tibia resulting from chronic osteomyelitis. Thirty-two patients were treated with external fixation alone and 17 patients with the combined technique. Surgical reconstruction utilised distraction osteogenesis by focal segment transport after infection was eradicated. In the external fixation group, the mean size of the defect was 724 cm, external fixation index was 56.32 days/cm and consolidation index was 40.09 day/cm. In the combined technique group, the mean size of the defect was 8.89 cm, external fixation index was 1631 days/cm and consolidation index was 25.7 days/cm. There was no difference in non-union, deformity, limb length discrepancy (LLD), bone and functional results. However, there was a higher rate of reinfection in the combined group when tibial lengthening exceeded 9.25 cm and lengthening ratio was more than 24.8%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23162962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  8 in total

1.  Cost of external fixation vs external fixation then nailing in bone infection.

Authors:  Khaled Mohamed Emara; Ramy Ahmed Diab; Khaled Abd El Ghafar
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

2.  Does Integrated Fixation Provide Benefit in the Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Tibial Bone Defects?

Authors:  Mitchell Bernstein; Austin T Fragomen; Samir Sabharwal; Jonathan Barclay; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Insights into treatment and outcome of fracture-related infection: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  H Bezstarosti; E M M Van Lieshout; L W Voskamp; K Kortram; W Obremskey; M A McNally; W J Metsemakers; M H J Verhofstad
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Comparision of Ilizarov Ring Fixator and Rail Fixator in Infected Nonunion of Long Bones: A Retrospective Followup Study.

Authors:  Ravisha Bhardwaj; Jaspal Singh; Rajesh Kapila; Randhir S Boparai
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Antibiotic calcium sulfate-loaded hybrid transport versus traditional Ilizarov bone transport in the treatment of large tibial defects after trauma.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Cheng Ren; Ming Li; YiBo Xu; Zhong Li; Hua Lin; Kun Zhang; Teng Ma
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation versus simple bone transport in the treatment of large bone defects of lower limbs after trauma.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Yi Bo Xu; Cheng Ren; Ming Li; Cheng Cheng Zhang; Lu Liu; Qian Wang; Yao Lu; Hua Lin; Zhong Li; Han Zhong Xue; Kun Zhang; Teng Ma
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  Management of critical-sized bone defects in the treatment of fracture-related infection: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  H Bezstarosti; W J Metsemakers; E M M van Lieshout; L W Voskamp; K Kortram; M A McNally; L C Marais; M H J Verhofstad
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Nailing treatment in bone transport complications.

Authors:  C Biz; C Iacobellis
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2014-07-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.