Literature DB >> 23162775

The role of tumor expression of CD200 in tumor formation, metastasis and susceptibility to T lymphocyte adoptive transfer therapy.

Fatemeh Talebian1, Xue-Feng Bai.   

Abstract

CD200 is a cell surface glycoprotein that has been implicated in a variety of human cancer cells and has been thought to play a pro-tumor role. However, in our recent study we have revealed that CD200 on cancer cells inhibits tumor formation and metastasis through inhibition of myeloid cells.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23162775      PMCID: PMC3489763          DOI: 10.4161/onci.20034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Myeloid cells are pivotal in tumor initiation, tumor mass formation, tumor progression and metastasis. In the tumor initiation and formation stage, myeloid cells produce an array of factors that promote tumor establishment. During the tumor progression and metastasis stages, myeloid cells provide support for developing tissues through their matrix remodeling capacities, synthesis of growth and angiogenesis factors and capacities in suppressing antitumor immunity. Genetic ablation, depletion of myeloid cells or inhibition of myeloid cell functions have been shown to be effective in inhibiting tumor establishment and tumor progression. Increased number of myeloid cells has been shown to be associated with shortened survival of cancer patients. Thus, tumor associated myeloid cells (TAMC) have been proposed as targets for therapeutic intervention. CD200 (also known as OX-2) is a member of the Ig super family (IgSF) of proteins. It contains two extracellular immunoglobulin domains and a small intracellular domain with no known signaling motif. CD200R, the cognate ligand for CD200, is also an IgSF protein whose expression is mainly restricted to the myeloid lineage of cells. CD200-CD200R interaction is involved in limiting the cellular functions of myeloid lineage of cells, as CD200 deficient mice were found to have hyper activation of macrophages and enhanced inflammation in autoimmune disease models. Since TAMCs are the major lineages of cells expressing CD200R in the tumor microenvironment and expression of CD200 has been found in multiple types of cancer including melanoma, we hypothesized that tumor expression of CD200 inhibits the functions of TAMCs and thereby affects tumor formation, metastasis and susceptibility to T cell therapy. In a recent study, we have tested this hypothesis and we have made the following three observations. First, we have found that expression of CD200 on melanoma cells dramatically inhibited tumor foci formation in the lungs of both C57BL/6 and Rag1−/−C57BL/6 mice. Lung tumor formation and metastasis appear to be mediated by CD200R+Gr-1+ lung myeloid cells, as depletion of Gr-1+ myeloid cells using anti-Gr1 mAb abrogated lung tumor formation and metastasis of B16 melanoma. In vitro co-culture experiments revealed that CD200-positive tumor cells but not CD200-negative tumor cells strongly suppressed production of cytokines by myeloid cells. Thus, our data establish that tumor expression of CD200 inhibits tumor formation and metastasis via inhibiting CD200R+ myeloid cells. CD200 on cancer cells has previously been thought to play a pro-tumor role. In an animal study, CD200 expression was found to be positively correlated with the metastatic capacity of squamous cell carcinoma. However, it remains unclear if the induction of CD200 on tumor cells is responsible for tumor metastasis in that study. CD200 mRNA expression in myeloma cells has also been shown to be associated with decreased survival of patients. However, this result was challenged recently by another report, showing that loss of CD200 protein expression, but not expression of CD200 on myeloma cells correlates with clinically more aggressive disease. Thus, more studies are required for a solid conclusion in correlation studies. Second, we have found that triggering CD200R using an agonistic monoclonal antibody (OX110) dramatically reduced CD200-negative melanoma tumor formation in the lungs. Anti-CD200R mAb treatment significantly diminished production of cytokines by CD11b+ myeloid cells, suggesting that mAb OX110 can inhibit the functions of myeloid cells via engaging CD200R. Third, as we previously demonstrated, we found that adoptive transfer of tumor antigen-specific T cells (both CD4 and CD8) significantly promoted survival of mice with CD200-positive melanoma tumors over CD200-negative tumors. CD200-expressing melanoma cells were shown to downregulate Th1 cytokine production when co-cultured with allogenic leukocytes. It is therefore predicted that CD200-CD200R interaction induces suppression of anti-tumor T cell responses. However, we have found that CTL barely express CD200R and tumor expression of CD200 does not inhibit effector functions of CTL. Thus, our data suggest that tumor expression of CD200 is likely affecting T cell effector functions via inhibiting TAMCs. Taken together, our findings can be summarized in a model presented in Figure 1. Tumor cells recruit and interact with CD200R-positive myeloid cells. In the absence of CD200 inhibitory signal, TAMCs produce an array of cytokines, growth factors, enzymes and effector molecules such as reactive nitrogen/oxygen species that stimulate tumor formation and metastasis (Fig. 1A). In the presence of CD200 inhibitory signal, TAMCs have reduced production of those tumor promoting factors, which leads to reduced tumor formation and metastasis (Fig. 1B). Using a triggering antibody to CD200R could achieve similar results as CD200-expression on tumor cells (Fig. 1C). Finally, in an established CD200-negative tumor, production of high amounts of M2 cytokines and inhibitors by TAMCs lead to a very suppressive tumor microenvironment, which inhibits T cell effector function and tumor rejection (Fig. 1D). In the presence of CD200 signal delivered by tumor cells, reduced production of immune inhibitors by TAMCs lead to enhanced T cell effector function and tumor rejection (Fig. 1E).

Figure 1. The impacts of tumor expression of CD200 on melanoma lung metastasis and susceptibility to T cell therapy. Melanoma lung tumor formation depicted in the absence (A) and presence (B) of CD200 expression on tumor cells. An agonistic antibody to CD200R inhibits melanoma lung tumor formation and metastasis (C). T cell therapy of mice with established tumors whose tumor cells are negative for CD200 (D) or positive for CD200 (E).

Figure 1. The impacts of tumor expression of CD200 on melanoma lung metastasis and susceptibility to T cell therapy. Melanoma lung tumor formation depicted in the absence (A) and presence (B) of CD200 expression on tumor cells. An agonistic antibody to CD200R inhibits melanoma lung tumor formation and metastasis (C). T cell therapy of mice with established tumors whose tumor cells are negative for CD200 (D) or positive for CD200 (E). Given the important roles of CD200-CD200R interaction in regulating tumor associated myeloid cells and inhibiting tumor formation and metastasis, targeting CD200-CD200R interaction should provide an option for the immunotherapy of human cancer. Because of the restricted expression of CD200R to myeloid cells and the importance of these cells in essentially all tumor types, targeting CD200R should be an ideal option. Our successful treatment of CD200-negative tumors using a triggering anti-CD200R mAb proves that this approach is feasible.
  10 in total

1.  Down-regulation of the macrophage lineage through interaction with OX2 (CD200).

Authors:  R M Hoek; S R Ruuls; C A Murphy; G J Wright; R Goddard; S M Zurawski; B Blom; M E Homola; W J Streit; M H Brown; A N Barclay; J D Sedgwick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The origin and function of tumor-associated macrophages.

Authors:  A Mantovani; B Bottazzi; F Colotta; S Sozzani; L Ruco
Journal:  Immunol Today       Date:  1992-07

Review 3.  Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Bin-Zhi Qian; Jeffrey W Pollard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  CD200 is a new prognostic factor in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jerome Moreaux; Dirk Hose; Thierry Reme; Eric Jourdan; Michael Hundemer; Eric Legouffe; Philippe Moine; Philippe Bourin; Marion Moos; Jill Corre; Thomas Möhler; John De Vos; Jean Francois Rossi; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Bernard Klein
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  The immunosuppressive surface ligand CD200 augments the metastatic capacity of squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Magda Stumpfova; Desirée Ratner; Edward B Desciak; Yehuda D Eliezri; David M Owens
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Diagnostic usefulness and prognostic impact of CD200 expression in lymphoid malignancies and plasma cell myeloma.

Authors:  Daisy Alapat; Jean Coviello-Malle; Rebecca Owens; Pingping Qu; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy; Robert B Lorsbach
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Tumor expression of CD200 inhibits IL-10 production by tumor-associated myeloid cells and prevents tumor immune evasion of CTL therapy.

Authors:  Lixin Wang; Jin-Qing Liu; Fatemeh Talebian; Hani Y El-Omrani; Mazin Khattabi; Li Yu; Xue-Feng Bai
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  CD200 is induced by ERK and is a potential therapeutic target in melanoma.

Authors:  Kimberly B Petermann; Gabriela I Rozenberg; Daniel Zedek; Pamela Groben; Karen McKinnon; Christin Buehler; William Y Kim; Janiel M Shields; Shannon Penland; James E Bear; Nancy E Thomas; Jonathan S Serody; Norman E Sharpless
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 9.  CD200 and membrane protein interactions in the control of myeloid cells.

Authors:  A Neil Barclay; Gavin J Wright; Gary Brooke; Marion H Brown
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 16.687

10.  Melanoma cell expression of CD200 inhibits tumor formation and lung metastasis via inhibition of myeloid cell functions.

Authors:  Fatemeh Talebian; Jin-Qing Liu; Zhenzhen Liu; Mazin Khattabi; Yukai He; Ramesh Ganju; Xue-Feng Bai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Pre-transplant CD200 and CD200R1 concentrations are associated with post-transplant events in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Hani Oweira; Elias Khajeh; Sara Mohammadi; Omid Ghamarnejad; Volker Daniel; Paul Schnitzler; Mohammad Golriz; Markus Mieth; Christian Morath; Martin Zeier; Arianeb Mehrabi; Mahmoud Sadeghi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Immunohistochemical Expression of CD200 in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hala M El Hanbuli; Heba A Ibrahim; Somia A M Soliman
Journal:  J Microsc Ultrastruct       Date:  2020-12-29

3.  Gene network analysis to determine the effect of hypoxia-associated genes on brain damages and tumorigenesis using an avian model.

Authors:  Hamed Kharrati-Koopaee; Esmaeil Ebrahimie; Mohammad Dadpasand; Ali Niazi; Rugang Tian; Ali Esmailizadeh
Journal:  J Genet Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-08

Review 4.  Immunological dysregulation in multiple myeloma microenvironment.

Authors:  Alessandra Romano; Concetta Conticello; Maide Cavalli; Calogero Vetro; Alessia La Fauci; Nunziatina Laura Parrinello; Francesco Di Raimondo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Over-Expression of CD200 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Li Li; YanLi Tian; ChengFang Shi; Hua Zhang; Zhi Zhou
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-04-01

6.  NUDT2 Disruption Elevates Diadenosine Tetraphosphate (Ap4A) and Down-Regulates Immune Response and Cancer Promotion Genes.

Authors:  Andrew S Marriott; Olga Vasieva; Yongxiang Fang; Nikki A Copeland; Alexander G McLennan; Nigel J Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.