Literature DB >> 23162610

Comparative assessment of change in fat mass using dual X-ray absorptiometry and air-displacement plethysmography.

Joshua Warolin1, Jeff Kantor1, Lauren E Whitaker2, Leena Choi3, Sari Acra1, Maciej S Buchowski2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of body composition measurements to small, defined changes in fat mass between dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and air-displacement plethysmography (ADP).
METHODS: Fifty-six healthy adults, 29 women and 27 men (age, 38 ± 12.4 years; BMI, 27.6 ± 5.8 kg/m2) were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, indwelling metal hardware or pacemakers, or weight exceeding DXA table limit (>350 lbs). All individual testing was completed within a 2-hour period. Fat packets were prepared using lard wrapped in plastic and applied exogenously in defined locations. Each participant completed body composition measurements with ADP and DXA (both testing modalities completed with and without 1 kg of exogenously applied fat mass).
RESULTS: Both DXA and ADP were highly accurate in detecting an overall increase in body mass associated with exogenously applied 1kg of fat mass (0.99 kg vs. 0.97 kg, respectively). DXA more accurately detected exogenous fat increase as fat mass compared to ADP (0.93 kg; 90% CI for the mean of the difference: 0.83 to 1.03 kg vs. 0.45 kg; 90% CI: 0.19 to 0.71 kg, respectively). The accuracy of body mass detection was similar for males and females (0.97 vs. 1.02 for DXA and 0.92 vs. 1.02 for ADP, respectively), though accuracy in detecting added mass as fat was less accurate in males than females (0.84 vs. 1.00 for DXA and 0.39 vs. 0.51 for ADP, respectively). DISCUSSION: Both DXA and ADP are accurate in detecting an overall increase in body mass associated with exogenously applied 1kg of fat mass. However, DXA is more accurate than ADP in correctly identifying the increase in body mass as fat mass, as opposed to fat free mass.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body composition; technique; weight change

Year:  2012        PMID: 23162610      PMCID: PMC3498462          DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2012.00042.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obes        ISSN: 1758-8103


  27 in total

1.  Body composition of obese subjects by air displacement plethysmography: The influence of hydration.

Authors:  Marie Le Carvennec; Cédric Fagour; Emilie Adenis-Lamarre; Caroline Perlemoine; Henri Gin; Vincent Rigalleau
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity.

Authors:  A Must; J Spadano; E H Coakley; A E Field; G Colditz; W H Dietz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.

Authors:  D J Schuirmann
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12

4.  Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. 1961.

Authors:  W E Siri
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

5.  Density of lean body mass is greater in blacks than in whites.

Authors:  J E Schutte; E J Townsend; J Hugg; R F Shoup; R M Malina; C G Blomqvist
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1984-06

6.  Evaluation of the BOD POD for estimating percentage body fat in a heterogeneous group of adult humans.

Authors:  J D Vescovi; S L Zimmerman; W C Miller; L Hildebrandt; R L Hammer; B Fernhall
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Effect of scalp and facial hair on air displacement plethysmography estimates of percentage of body fat.

Authors:  P B Higgins; D A Fields; G R Hunter; B A Gower
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2001-05

8.  Comparison of methods to assess body composition changes during a period of weight loss.

Authors:  Madlyn I Frisard; Frank L Greenway; James P Delany
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-05

9.  iDXA, Prodigy, and DPXL dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry whole-body scans: a cross-calibration study.

Authors:  Holly Hull; Qing He; John Thornton; Fahad Javed; Lynn Allen; Jack Wang; Richard N Pierson; Dympna Gallagher
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for quantification of visceral fat.

Authors:  Sanjiv Kaul; Megan P Rothney; Dawn M Peters; Wynn K Wacker; Cynthia E Davis; Michael D Shapiro; David L Ergun
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 5.002

View more
  1 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of mid-upper arm circumference to identify overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Binyam Girma Sisay; Hamid Yimam Hassen; Seifu Hagos Gebreyesus
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.