Literature DB >> 23161059

Ectopic pregnancy: MRI findings and clinical utility.

Aki Takahashi1, Junko Takahama, Nagaaki Marugami, Megumi Takewa, Takahiro Itoh, Satoru Kitano, Kimihiko Kichikawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with clinically suspected ectopic pregnancy (EP).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed MRIs of 26 consecutive patients who were clinically suspected of having an EP. The diagnostic utility of MRI features of EP was analyzed retrospectively as follows: (1) Direct sign detection of ectopic gestational sac (GS); (2) Indirect signs tubal dilatation with hemosalpinx, adnexal hematoma, and hemorrhagic ascites. The diagnostic accuracy of each sign and their combination was compared to surgical records. The MRI findings of an ectopic GS were reviewed as follows: size, shape, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern.
RESULTS: Of 26 patients, 24 had a tubal pregnancy; 22 of these 24 patients (92%) had a direct sign (sensitivity: 91.3%; specificity: 100%; positive predictive value: 100%). The diagnostic accuracy of the direct sign was 92%; this was more accurate than that of any single indirect sign (39%, 54%, and 50%, respectively). However, the diagnostic accuracy of EP increased to 100% when diagnostic criteria required the presence of a direct sign or at least two indirect signs.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI is an effective modality for diagnosing EP with a high detection rate of extrauterine GSs. The combination of direct and indirect signs is useful for establishing the correct diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23161059     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-012-9969-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  8 in total

1.  Role of MRI in the early diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Ming-Jue Si; Shuang Gui; Qin Fan; Hong-Xiu Han; Qian-Qian Zhao; Zhi-Xin Li; Jiang-Min Zhao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in ectopic pregnancy: ring of restriction sign.

Authors:  Afak Durur-Karakaya; Mehmet Seker; İrmak Durur-Subasi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  To evaluate the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting unusual site ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Martina Derme; Maria Grazia Piccioni; Vincenzo Spina; Francesca Laghi; Gianfranco Gualdi; Marialuisa Framarino-Dei-Malatesta
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging - A troubleshooter in obstetric emergencies: A pictorial review.

Authors:  Rohini Gupta; Sunil Kumar Bajaj; Nishith Kumar; Ranjan Chandra; Ritu Nair Misra; Amita Malik; Brij Bhushan Thukral
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  Cross-sectional imaging of acute gynaecologic disorders: CT and MRI findings with differential diagnosis-part I: corpus luteum and haemorrhagic ovarian cysts, genital causes of haemoperitoneum and adnexal torsion.

Authors:  Massimo Tonolini; Pietro Valerio Foti; Valeria Costanzo; Luca Mammino; Stefano Palmucci; Antonio Cianci; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre; Antonio Basile
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-12-19

6.  Ectopic pregnancy implanted under the diaphragm: A rare case report.

Authors:  Qiang-Le Wu; Xiao-Man Wang; Dong Tang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  A Case of Ovarian Pregnancy Diagnosed by MRI.

Authors:  Shingo Io; Masaaki Hasegawa; Takashi Koyama
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-27

8.  Primary hepatic ectopic pregnancy in a patient with polycystic ovary syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Ning Zhang; Linqing Yang; Yunfei Wang; Xiaoyu Li; Chao Zhang; Jing Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.