Literature DB >> 23160811

The behavioral and neural effect of emotional primes on intertemporal decisions.

Shan Luo1, George Ainslie, John Monterosso.   

Abstract

Research on intertemporal behavior has emphasized trait-like variance. However, recent studies have begun to explore situational factors that affect intertemporal preference. In this study, we examined the associations between emotional primes and both behavior and brain function during intertemporal decision making. Twenty-two participants completed a dual task in which they were required to make intertemporal choices while holding an expressive face in memory. From trial-to-trial, the facial expression varied between three alternatives: (i) fearful, (ii) happy and (iii) neutral. Brain activity was recorded using functional magnetic resonance imaging for 16 participants. Behavioral data indicated that fearful (relative to happy) faces were associated with greater preference for larger but later rewards. During observation of fearful faces, greater signal change was observed in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. During subsequent decision making, the fear prime was associated with greater signal increase in structures including the posterior sector of the anterior cingulate cortex. Individual differences in this activity correlated with the magnitude of the priming effect on behavior. These findings suggest that incidental emotions affect intertemporal choice. Increased farsightedness after the fear prime may be explained by an 'inhibition spillover' effect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fMRI; incidental emotions; inhibition spillover; intertemporal choice

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23160811      PMCID: PMC3980799          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nss132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  54 in total

Review 1.  Temporal discounting: basic research and the analysis of socially important behavior.

Authors:  T S Critchfield; S H Kollins
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of prefrontal-mediotemporal interactions.

Authors:  Jan Peters; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Consciousness and arousal effects on emotional face processing as revealed by brain oscillations. A gamma band analysis.

Authors:  Michela Balconi; Claudio Lucchiari
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 4.  The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: emotional expression and brain physiology. I.

Authors:  R J Davidson; P Ekman; C D Saron; J A Senulis; W V Friesen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-02

6.  Are emotions contagious? Evoked emotions while viewing emotionally expressive faces: quality, quantity, time course and gender differences.

Authors:  B Wild; M Erb; M Bartels
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future?

Authors:  Margo Wilson; Martin Daly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Behavioral and neural evidence of incentive bias for immediate rewards relative to preference-matched delayed rewards.

Authors:  Shan Luo; George Ainslie; Lisa Giragosian; John R Monterosso
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Approaching the bad and avoiding the good: lateral prefrontal cortical asymmetry distinguishes between action and valence.

Authors:  Elliot T Berkman; Matthew D Lieberman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls.

Authors:  Kris N Kirby; Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice.

Authors:  Karolina M Lempert; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  An adaptive, individualized fMRI delay discounting procedure to increase flexibility and optimize scanner time.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Harshawardhan U Deshpande; Jonathan M Lisinski; Anders Eklund; Warren K Bickel; Stephen M LaConte
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Frontotemporal Regulation of Subjective Value to Suppress Impulsivity in Intertemporal Choices.

Authors:  Stefan Dürschmid; Andre Maric; Marcel S Kehl; Robert T Knight; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09

5.  Episodic future thinking and anticipatory emotions: Effects on delay discounting and preventive behaviors during COVID-19.

Authors:  X T XiaoTian Wang; Peng Wang; Junsong Lu; Jianjun Zhou; Grunting Li; Steven Garelik
Journal:  Appl Psychol Health Well Being       Date:  2022-02-22

6.  Willpower with and without effort.

Authors:  George Ainslie
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 21.357

7.  Myopic decisions under negative emotions correlate with altered time perception.

Authors:  Shuchen Guan; Lu Cheng; Ying Fan; Xianchun Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-17

8.  Negative incidental emotions augment fairness sensitivity.

Authors:  Cuizhen Liu; Jing Wen Chai; Rongjun Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Alcohol Use Disorder Interventions Targeting Brain Sites for Both Conditioned Reward and Delayed Gratification.

Authors:  Brandon G Oberlin; Yitong I Shen; David A Kareken
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  Errors affect hypothetical intertemporal food choice in women.

Authors:  Manuela Sellitto; Giuseppe di Pellegrino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.