Literature DB >> 23160240

Ways of experiencing participation and factors affecting the activity level after nonreconstructed anterior cruciate ligament injury: a qualitative study.

Annika Österberg1, Joanna Kvist, Madeleine Abrandt Dahlgren.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Phenomenographic, cross-sectional.
OBJECTIVES: To describe ways of experiencing participation in activities of individuals with a nonreconstructed anterior cruciate ligament injury and to describe the emotional aspects related to participation. Further, the objective was to explore factors affecting the activity level.
BACKGROUND: The importance of assessing different factors (knee status, muscle performance, psychological factors, performance-based tests, and subjective rating of knee function) after an anterior cruciate ligament injury has been emphasized. However, the results of these assessments do not answer the question of how the individuals themselves experience their participation in activities.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 strategically selected informants (age range, 18-43 years) who had sustained an anterior cruciate ligament injury 18 to 67 months previously. A phenomenographic approach, which describes individuals' ways of experiencing a phenomenon, was used.
RESULTS: Five qualitatively different categories were identified: (A) unconditioned participation, (B) participation as conditioned by risk appraisal, (C) participation as conditioned by experienced control of the knee, (D) participation as conditioned by experienced knee impairment, and (E) participation as conditioned by neglecting the knee injury. Within each category, 5 interrelated aspects were discerned: focus, level of performance, activities, strategies, and feelings. Categories A, C, and E reflected experiences of full participation, whereas categories B and D reflected experiences of modified participation. There were mostly positive feelings regarding participation. Negative feelings were expressed in category D. Factors affecting the activity level were grouped according to the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and described as facilitating or hindering the activity level. Facilitating factors included regaining and maintaining physical function, regaining confidence in knee function, and learning/relearning movement patterns. Hindering factors included fear of injury/reinjury, uncontrollable giving way, and loss of motivation.
CONCLUSION: With different strategies, most of the informants achieved a satisfactory activity level, despite impairments and decreased activity level. Both physical and psychological factors were described to affect the activity level, as well as time since injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23160240     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  8 in total

1.  Research Dominance Definitions May Not Identify Higher Risk Limb for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in NCAA D3 Student-Athletes.

Authors:  Paul A Cacolice; Brianna E Starkey; Christopher R Carcia; Paul E Higgins
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  THE USE OF FUNCTIONAL TESTS TO PREDICT SAGITTAL PLANE KNEE KINEMATICS IN NCAA-D1 FEMALE ATHLETES.

Authors:  Paul A Cacolice; Christopher R Carcia; Jason S Scibek; Amy L Phelps
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-08

3.  Vertical stiffness is not related to anterior cruciate ligament elongation in professional rugby union players.

Authors:  Benjamin G Serpell; Jennie M Scarvell; Mark R Pickering; Nick B Ball; Diana Perriman; John Warmenhoven; Paul N Smith
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2016-11-01

4.  Natural corollaries and recovery after acute ACL injury: the NACOX cohort study protocol.

Authors:  Joanna Kvist; Håkan Gauffin; Hanna Tigerstrand Grevnerts; Clare Ardern; Martin Hägglund; Anders Stålman; Richard Frobell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Impaired neuromuscular control up to postoperative 1 year in operated and nonoperated knees after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin Hyuck Lee; Seung-Beom Han; Jong-Hoon Park; Jae-Hyuk Choi; Dae Keun Suh; Ki-Mo Jang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Decision Making for Treatment After ACL Injury From an Orthopaedic Surgeon and Patient Perspective: Results From the NACOX Study.

Authors:  Hanna Tigerstrand Grevnerts; Sofi Sonesson; Håkan Gauffin; Clare L Ardern; Anders Stålman; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-15

7.  Disrupted knee - disrupted me: a strenuous process of regaining balance in the aftermath of an anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Josefin Karlström; Maria Wiklund; Eva Tengman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Psychological factors are important to return to pre-injury sport activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: expect and motivate to satisfy.

Authors:  Sofi Sonesson; Joanna Kvist; Clare Ardern; Annika Österberg; Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.