Literature DB >> 23160126

Molecular diversity of Bacteroidales in fecal and environmental samples and swine-associated subpopulations.

Regina Lamendella1, Kent C Li, Daniel Oerther, Jorge W Santo Domingo.   

Abstract

Several swine-specific microbial source tracking methods are based on PCR assays targeting Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences. The limited application of these assays can be explained by the poor understanding of their molecular diversity in fecal sources and environmental waters. In order to address this, we studied the diversity of 9,340 partial (>600 bp in length) Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences from 13 fecal sources and nine feces-contaminated watersheds. The compositions of major Bacteroidales populations were analyzed to determine which host and environmental sequences were contributing to each group. This information allowed us to identify populations which were both exclusive to swine fecal sources and detected in swine-contaminated waters. Phylogenetic and diversity analyses revealed that some markers previously believed to be highly specific to swine populations are shared by multiple hosts, potentially explaining the cross-amplification signals obtained with nontargeted hosts. These data suggest that while many Bacteroidales populations are cosmopolitan, others exhibit a preferential host distribution and may be able to survive different environmental conditions. This study further demonstrates the importance of elucidating the diversity patterns of targeted bacterial groups to develop more inclusive fecal source tracking applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23160126      PMCID: PMC3568562          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02535-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  42 in total

1.  A PCR assay To discriminate human and ruminant feces on the basis of host differences in Bacteroides-Prevotella genes encoding 16S rRNA.

Authors:  A E Bernhard; K G Field
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  In-feed antibiotic effects on the swine intestinal microbiome.

Authors:  Torey Looft; Timothy A Johnson; Heather K Allen; Darrell O Bayles; David P Alt; Robert D Stedtfeld; Woo Jun Sul; Tiffany M Stedtfeld; Benli Chai; James R Cole; Syed A Hashsham; James M Tiedje; Thad B Stanton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Diversity and population structure of sewage-derived microorganisms in wastewater treatment plant influent.

Authors:  S L McLellan; S M Huse; S R Mueller-Spitz; E N Andreishcheva; M L Sogin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  Evaluating the importance of faecal sources in human-impacted waters.

Authors:  Mary E Schoen; Jeffrey A Soller; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Lachnospiraceae and Bacteroidales alternative fecal indicators reveal chronic human sewage contamination in an urban harbor.

Authors:  Ryan J Newton; Jessica L Vandewalle; Mark A Borchardt; Marc H Gorelick; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  The effects of submerged aquatic vegetation on the persistence of environmental populations of Enterococcus spp.

Authors:  Brian D Badgley; Florence I M Thomas; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 5.491

7.  Comparison of gull feces-specific assays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of Catellicoccus marimammalium and Streptococcus spp.

Authors:  Hodon Ryu; John F Griffith; Izhar U H Khan; Stephen Hill; Thomas A Edge; Carlos Toledo-Hernandez; Joel Gonzalez-Nieves; Jorge Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes.

Authors:  Gary D Wu; Jun Chen; Christian Hoffmann; Kyle Bittinger; Ying-Yu Chen; Sue A Keilbaugh; Meenakshi Bewtra; Dan Knights; William A Walters; Rob Knight; Rohini Sinha; Erin Gilroy; Kernika Gupta; Robert Baldassano; Lisa Nessel; Hongzhe Li; Frederic D Bushman; James D Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Comparative fecal metagenomics unveils unique functional capacity of the swine gut.

Authors:  Regina Lamendella; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Shreya Ghosh; John Martinson; Daniel B Oerther
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 10.  How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture.

Authors:  Leo Horrigan; Robert S Lawrence; Polly Walker
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  Tracking the primary sources of fecal pollution in a tropical watershed in a one-year study.

Authors:  Carlos Toledo-Hernandez; Hodon Ryu; Joel Gonzalez-Nieves; Evelyn Huertas; Gary A Toranzos; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Pyrosequencing-based analysis of fecal microbial communities in three purebred pig lines.

Authors:  Edward Alain B Pajarillo; Jong Pyo Chae; Marilen P Balolong; Hyeun Bum Kim; Kang-Seok Seo; Dae-Kyung Kang
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.422

3.  Development of new host-specific Bacteroides qPCRs for the identification of fecal contamination sources in water.

Authors:  Marta Gómez-Doñate; Arnau Casanovas-Massana; Maite Muniesa; Anicet R Blanch
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.139

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.