Literature DB >> 23159960

Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.

Timothy R Deer1, Christopher K Kim, Richard G Bowman, Matthew T Ranson, Brian Scott Yee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients often suffer from multiple etiologies, and patient symptoms must be differentiated and identified as either neurogenic claudication, radicular pain, or both. The most common symptom associated with LSS is neurogenic claudication, which has been reported to occur in 91% to 100% of the LSS patient population. Neurogenic claudication symptoms are described as pain radiating to the lower extremities that begins and worsens as the patient ambulates. Neurogenic claudication symptoms worsen over time and can eventually result in significant life-altering functional limitations. Symptomatic LSS patients may also suffer from radicular pain, which is a persistent pain transmitted through neural pathways, and is associated with inflammation of the exiting nerve root.
OBJECTIVE: To assess patient safety, pain reduction, and functional status of patients treated with percutaneous lumbar decompression. STUDY
DESIGN: Single-center, prospective clinical study of 46 consecutive patients with neurogenic claudication symptoms related to lumbar spinal stenosis.
SETTING: US interventional pain management practice.
METHODS: From March 2010 to January 2011, 46 LSS patients suffering from neurogenic claudication underwent mild percutaneous lumbar decompression. Of these, 12-week, 6-month and one-year follow-up was available for 35 patients. OUTCOME ASSESSMENT: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 12-week, 6-month and one-year follow-ups.
RESULTS: One-year follow-up patients in this study experienced statistically and clinically significant improvement in physical function, as well as reduction of pain intensity. The initial improvement in these patients, which was significant, was sustained through one year, with no significant differences among the interim follow-up visit periods. These results demonstrate early improvement following treatment with a high degree of durability over time. There were no serious device or procedure-related complications reported in this study. LIMITATIONS: Single-center study with no control group.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the mild procedure was shown to be safe. In addition, patients experienced significant improvement in mobility and reduction of pain one year after the procedure. One-year outcomes were not significantly different from interim results, indicating that the significant improvement following treatment, occurring as early as 12 weeks, was maintained through one year. This high degree of consistency over time indicates the durability of percutaneous lumbar decompression in the treatment of neurogenic claudication in symptomatic LSS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23159960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  6 in total

Review 1.  Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN).

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Jay S Grider; Jason E Pope; Tim J Lamer; Sayed E Wahezi; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Steven Falowski; Reda Tolba; Jay M Shah; Natalie Strand; Alex Escobar; Mark Malinowski; Anjum Bux; Navdeep Jassal; Jennifer Hah; Jacqueline Weisbein; Nestor D Tomycz; Jessica Jameson; Erika A Petersen; Dawood Sayed
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.832

Review 2.  The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Carolina G Fritsch; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Rafael Z Pinto; Bart Koes; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The Impact of Age on the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Nagy A Mekhail; Shrif J Costandi; Sherif Armanyous; Ricardo Vallejo; Lawrence R Poree; Lora L Brown; Stanley Golovac; Timothy R Deer
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2020-06-04

4.  The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild® Procedure: One-Year Results.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Shrif J Costandi; Edward Washabaugh; Timothy B Chafin; Sayed E Wahezi; Navdeep Jassal; Dawood Sayed
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Decompression Surgery versus Interspinous Devices for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jennifer Tram; Shanmukha Srinivas; Arvin R Wali; Courtney S Lewis; Martin H Pham
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-01-08

6.  Assessing the Impact of Neurogenic Claudication on Outcomes Following Decompression With Lumbar Interbody Fusions in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Michael L Martini; Dominic A Nistal; Brian C Deutsch; Sean N Neifert; Colin D Lamb; John M Caridi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-02-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.