Literature DB >> 23158958

A comprehensive analysis of features that suggest bipolarity in patients with a major depressive episode: which is the best combination to predict soft bipolarity diagnosis?

Minoru Takeshima1, Takashi Oka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to identify specific predictors of soft bipolarity (bipolar II disorder or bipolar disorder not otherwise specified) in depressed patients and to evaluate the global predictive performance of combinations of these predictors.
METHODS: Subjects included 199 patients with a major depressive episode (MDE) due to soft bipolarity or major depressive disorder. Independent predictors of soft bipolar diagnosis were extracted from 12 previously proposed bipolar features using multiple logistic regression analyses, and the global performance of the combination of these predictors was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
RESULTS: Recurrent MDEs, family history of bipolar disorders in first-degree relatives, cyclothymic temperament, early age at onset of first MDE, and depressive mixed state were independent predictors of soft bipolarity diagnosis [odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 11.22 (2.19-57.63), 8.82 (1.31-59.15), 7.32 (2.22-24.19), 6.22 (1.58-24.57), and 5.57 (1.91-16.30), respectively]. The area under the ROC curve for the relationship between soft bipolarity diagnosis and the number of these five predictors in each patient was 0.911 (highly accurate). The presence of one or more predictors in each patient resulted in highest sensitivity (92.5%) and good specificity (73.1%), whereas that of two or more predictors resulted in good sensitivity (70.0%) and highest specificity (97.5%) for soft bipolarity diagnosis. LIMITATIONS: Structured/semistructured interviews were not used. Tools for temperament assessments were different between institutions.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of these predictors was quite helpful for a precise diagnosis of soft bipolarity in patients with depression.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23158958     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  5 in total

1.  Utility of TEMPS-A in differentiation between major depressive disorder, bipolar I disorder, and bipolar II disorder.

Authors:  Chihiro Morishita; Rie Kameyama; Hiroyuki Toda; Jiro Masuya; Masahiko Ichiki; Ichiro Kusumi; Takeshi Inoue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Difference in the prevalence of non-fatal suicidal behaviours in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression in China: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peiwei Shan; Liuzhen Hu; Dali Xu; Chunxia Fang; Jie Li; Deguo Jiang; Wei Zhang; Chuanjun Zhuo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-02-22

3.  Association between anxious distress in a major depressive episode and bipolarity.

Authors:  Hiroko Sugawara; Takahiro Tsutsumi; Ken Inada; Jun Ishigooka; Mamoru Hashimoto; Minoru Takebayashi; Katsuji Nishimura
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 2.570

4.  Development of the 12-item questionnaire for quantitative assessment of depressive mixed state (DMX-12).

Authors:  Hotaka Shinzato; Munenaga Koda; Akifumi Nakamura; Tsuyoshi Kondo
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.570

5.  The effectiveness of lamotrigine for persistent depressive disorder: A case report.

Authors:  Yusuke Matsuzaka; Kayoko Urashima; Shintaro Sakai; Yoshiro Morimoto; Shinji Kanegae; Hirohisa Kinoshita; Akira Imamura; Hiroki Ozawa
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacol Rep       Date:  2022-01-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.