Literature DB >> 23158893

Relatively high incidence of complications after loop ileostomy reversal.

Alaa El-Hussuna1, Morten Lauritsen, Steffen Bülow.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A de-functioning loop ileostomy (LI) reduces the consequences of anastomotic leak following low anterior resection, but its construction as well as its closure can be associated with complications. The aim of the present study was to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and particularly to determine if operation performed by trainees carry a higher risk of complications than operation performed by experienced surgeons.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre analysis of the medical records of 159 consecutive patients who underwent LI closure following low anterior resection for rectal cancer in the period from January 2002 to December 2008.
RESULTS: Postoperative complications developed in 32 patients (20.1%). Surgical complications occurred in 27 patients (17%) including small bowel obstruction in five (3%), anastomotic leak in four (2.5%), wound infection in eight (5%) and incisional hernia in eight (5%). There was no postoperative mortality. Univariate analysis showed that an increased rate of complications was associated with female gender (p = 0.02), small bowel resection at closure (p = 0.009) and a long interval between construction and closure of the loop ileostomy (p = 0.049).
CONCLUSION: Closure of an LI is associated with a low mortality, but a relatively high rate of complications. Operation performed by trainees was not associated with an increased complication rate. More complications were seen in patients who underwent small bowel resection and those who had delayed ileostomy closure. FUNDING: not relevant TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23158893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med J        ISSN: 2245-1919            Impact factor:   1.240


  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Loop Ileostomy Reversal: Is there an Advantage to a Minimally Invasive Approach?

Authors:  Monica T Young; Grace S Hwang; Gopal Menon; Timothy F Feldmann; Mehraneh D Jafari; Fariba Jafari; Eden Perez; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy.

Authors:  F De Haes; N L Bullen; G A Antoniou; N J Smart; S A Antoniou
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Wiebke Sewald; Norbert Senninger; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Hernia at the stoma site after loop ileostomy reversal.

Authors:  Karolina Eklöv; Fred Zika Viktorsson; Eric Frosztega; Sven Bringman; Jonas Nygren; Åsa H Everhov
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure.

Authors:  C Stabilini; M A Garcia-Urena; F Berrevoet; D Cuccurullo; S Capoccia Giovannini; M Dajko; L Rossi; K Decaestecker; M López Cano
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Short-stay compared to long-stay admissions for loop ileostomy reversals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victoria Archer; Zacharie Cloutier; Annie Berg; Tyler McKechnie; Wojtek Wiercioch; Cagla Eskicioglu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Necessity of subcutaneous suction drains in ileostomy reversal (DRASTAR)-a randomized, controlled bi-centered trial.

Authors:  J C Lauscher; V Schneider; L D Lee; A Stroux; H J Buhr; M E Kreis; J P Ritz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  High 1-year complication rate after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  H S Snijders; I S Bakker; J W T Dekker; T A Vermeer; E C J Consten; C Hoff; J M Klaase; K Havenga; R A E M Tollenaar; T Wiggers
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Complications after Loop Ileostomy Closure: A Retrospective Analysis of 132 Patients.

Authors:  Eligijus Poskus; Edvinas Kildusis; Edgaras Smolskas; Marijus Ambrazevicius; Kestutis Strupas
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.