Literature DB >> 2315829

Estimation of intracranial pressure using computed tomography scan findings in patients with severe head injury.

T Mizutani1, S Manaka, H Tsutsumi.   

Abstract

The relationship between initial intracranial pressure and the findings of the first computed tomography scan on admission was assessed in 100 consecutive moderate-to-severe head injury patients using a method of multiple regression analysis. Intracranial pressure was measured through a slender subarachnoid catheter with a transducer. Thirty-nine checkpoints of computed tomography findings, including a shift of midline structure, the status of ventricles or cisterns, and the amount of subarachnoid hemorrhage, were investigated. The results were as follows: (1) The computed tomography findings that contributed to estimating intracranial pressure were the appearance of cisterns, the size of a subdural hematoma (number of slices), ventricular size, status of subarachnoid hemorrhage, status of cerebral contusion, magnitude of midline shift, and ventricular index, in that order. (2) Approximately 80% of predicted cases of intracranial pressure were included within the range of measured intracranial pressure +/- 10 mmHg. When the predicted intracranial pressure was less than 30 mmHg, the discrepancy between both intracranial pressures was small. It is concluded that an equation using several computed tomography findings gives a reasonably accurate intracranial pressure for the initial stage of severe head injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2315829     DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(90)90181-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  10 in total

1.  Non-invasive methods of estimating intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Jamie B Rosenberg; Ariel L Shiloh; Richard H Savel; Lewis A Eisen
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Non-invasive intracranial pressure assessment.

Authors:  Llewellyn C Padayachy
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Noninvasive methods of detecting increased intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Patrick Gerety; Tomas Aleman; Jordan Swanson; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Noninvasive assessment of cerebrospinal fluid pressure.

Authors:  Beau B Bruce
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Intracranial pressure monitoring: fundamental considerations and rationale for monitoring.

Authors:  Randall Chesnut; Walter Videtta; Paul Vespa; Peter Le Roux
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 6.  Brain Midline Shift Measurement and Its Automation: A Review of Techniques and Algorithms.

Authors:  Chun-Chih Liao; Ya-Fang Chen; Furen Xiao
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 7.  Review: pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension and noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Nicolas Canac; Kian Jalaleddini; Samuel G Thorpe; Corey M Thibeault; Robert B Hamilton
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-06-23

8.  A nomogram for estimating intracranial pressure using acute subdural hematoma thickness and midline shift.

Authors:  Chun-Chih Liao; Heng-Chun Liao; Feipei Lai; Furen Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Midline Shift is Unrelated to Subjective Pupillary Reactivity Assessment on Admission in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Basil Nourallah; David K Menon; Frederick A Zeiler
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Thresholds for identifying pathological intracranial pressure in paediatric traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Saeed Kayhanian; Adam M H Young; Ross L Ewen; Rory J Piper; Mathew R Guilfoyle; Joseph Donnelly; Helen M Fernandes; Matthew Garnett; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Shruti Agrawal; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.