Literature DB >> 23158212

The diagnostic use of ERG in resolving an "atypical glands suspicious for cancer" diagnosis in prostate biopsies beyond that provided by basal cell and α-methylacyl-CoA-racemase markers.

Rajal B Shah1, Yousef Tadros, Brenda Brummell, Ming Zhou.   

Abstract

Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for ERG is used as a surrogate for TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion, a specific molecular event seen in ~50% of prostate carcinomas (PCas) and ~20% of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) intermingled with adjacent PCa demonstrating identical gene fusions. We studied 84 "atypical glands suspicious for cancer (ATYP)" cases using multiplex ERG/α-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (AMACR)/high-molecular-weight cytokeratin/p63 IHC to determine how often ERG contributes to resolving an ATYP diagnosis beyond that provided by AMACR and basal markers. Final diagnoses of benign, ATYP, and cancer were rendered after review of morphology and all markers in 3, 30, and 51 cases, respectively. Of 51 cancer diagnoses, 45% and 94% were positive for ERG and AMACR, respectively. Of 30 atypical diagnoses, 10% and 67% were positive for ERG and AMACR, respectively. Of 3 benign diagnoses, none and 83% were positive for ERG and AMACR, respectively. Three ERG-positive atypical cases were classified as "HGPIN with adjacent ATYP." ERG was expressed in adjacent noncancer glands of 20% of PCas, whereas AMACR was expressed in noncancer glands in all diagnostic categories in 40% of cases. Positive ERG staining helped establish the initial ATYP diagnosis to PCa in 28% cases whose diagnoses would otherwise remain ATYP based on AMACR and basal markers. ERG positivity in small atypical glands where HGPIN diagnosis is excluded helps establish a definitive cancer diagnosis in a small proportion of additional ATYP cases. We recommend judicious use of ERG, preferably as a component of multiplex IHC, in evaluation of difficult prostate biopsies.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23158212     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  3 in total

Review 1.  ERG expression in prostate cancer: biological relevance and clinical implication.

Authors:  Hatem Abou-Ouf; Liena Zhao; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Prostate cancer in Jordanian-Arab population: ERG status and relationship with clinicopathologic characteristics.

Authors:  Najla Aldaoud; Nour Abdo; Samir Al Bashir; Mohammad Alqudah; Noor Marji; Hiba Alzou'bi; Rami Alazab; Kiril Trpkov
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  A-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) and prostate-cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 4,385 participants.

Authors:  Ning Jiang; Shimiao Zhu; Jing Chen; Yuanjie Niu; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.