Literature DB >> 23158121

Comparison of Topping-off and posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery in lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective study.

Hai-ying Liu1, Jian Zhou, Bo Wang, Hui-min Wang, Zhao-hui Jin, Zhen-qi Zhu, Ke-nan Miao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Topping-off surgery is a newly-developed surgical technique which combines rigid fusion with an interspinous process device in the adjacent segment to prevent adjacent segment degeneration. There are few reports on Topping-off surgery and its rationality and indications remains highly controversial. Our study aims to investigate the short-term and mid-term clinical results of Topping-off surgery in preventing adjacent segment degeneration when mild or moderate adjacent segment degeneration existed before surgery.
METHODS: The 25 cases that underwent L5-S1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) + L4-L5 interspinous process surgeries between April 2008 and March 2010 formed Topping-off group. The 42 cases undergoing L5-S1 PLIF surgery formed PLIF group. Both groups matched in gender, age, body mass index and Pfirrmann grading (4 to 6). The patients were evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) scores before surgery and in the last follow-up. Modic changes of endplates were recorded.
RESULTS: The follow-up averaged 24.8 and 23.7 months. No symptomatic or radiological adjacent segment degeneration was observed. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss or postoperative drainage. VAS and lumbar JOA scores improved significantly in both groups (t = 12.1 and 13.5, P < 0.05). Neither anterior nor posterior disc height was significantly changed. Segmental lordosis of L4-L5 and total lordosis were all increased significantly (Topping-off group: t = -2.30 and -2.24,P < 0.05; PLIF group: t = -2.76 and -1.83, P < 0.01). In the hyperextension and hyperflexion view, Topping-off group's range of motion (ROM) and olisthesis in the L4-L5 segment did not significantly change in flexion, but decreased in extension. In PLIF group, ROM (t = -7.82 and -4.90, P < 0.01) and olisthesis (t = -15.67 and -18.58, P < 0.01) both significantly increased in extension and flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with single segment PLIF surgery, Topping-off surgery can achieve similar symptomatic improvement in cases with pre-existing mild or moderate adjacent segment degeneration, restrict the adjacent segment's ROM in extension and prevent excessive olisthesis of adjacent segment in both extension and flexion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23158121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  12 in total

1.  [Spinal column: implants and revisions].

Authors:  S M Krieg; H S Meyer; B Meyer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Do in vivo kinematic studies provide insight into adjacent segment degeneration? A qualitative systematic literature review.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; David Volkheimer; John Street; Marcel F Dvorak; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Operative options for failed back surgery syndrome].

Authors:  S M Krieg; B Meyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The effects of single-level instrumented lumbar laminectomy on adjacent spinal biomechanics.

Authors:  Arno Bisschop; Roderick M Holewijn; Idsart Kingma; Agnita Stadhouder; Pieter-Paul A Vergroesen; Albert J van der Veen; Jaap H van Dieën; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-11-06

5.  Bone resorption during the first year after implantation of a single-segment dynamic interspinous stabilization device and its risk factors.

Authors:  Kaifeng Wang; Zhenqi Zhu; Bo Wang; Yi Zhu; Haiying Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Topping-off technique prevents aggravation of degeneration of adjacent segment fusion revealed by retrospective and finite element biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Zhenqi Zhu; Chenjun Liu; Kaifeng Wang; Jian Zhou; Jiefu Wang; Yi Zhu; Haiying Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 7.  Could the Topping-Off Technique Be the Preventive Strategy against Adjacent Segment Disease after Pedicle Screw-Based Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Po-Hsin Chou; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Howard S An; Kang-Ying Liu; Wei-Ren Su; Cheng-Li Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Topping-Off Technology versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xiangyao Sun; Tongtong Zhang; Siyuan Sun; Chao Kong; Shibao Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Dynamic Stabilization Adjacent to Fusion versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiangyao Sun; Zhaoxiong Chen; Siyuan Sun; Wei Wang; Tongtong Zhang; Chao Kong; Shibao Lu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Comparison between topping-off technology and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of chronic low back pain: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xiangyao Sun; Tongtong Zhang; Siyuan Sun; Chao Kong; Junzhe Ding; Xiangyu Li; Shibao Lu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.