Literature DB >> 23158035

Number of involved lymph nodes is important in the prediction of prognosis for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma.

Tsung-Jung Liang1, Being-Whey Wang, Shiuh-Inn Liu, Nan-Hua Chou, Cheng-Chung Tsai, I-Shu Chen, Ming-Hsin Yeh, Yu-Chia Chen, Po-Min Chang, King-Tong Mok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The significance of lymph node involvement regarding the prognosis of primary duodenal adenocarcinoma remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of nodal metastasis using the seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system in patients with primary duodenal adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: Between 1993 and 2010, 36 patients who had undergone surgical resection for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma at the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: The median disease-free survival for all patients was 19 months and the median overall survival was 21 months. Lymph node metastases were found in 26 (72%) of the patients, and 14 patients (39%) patients had in excess of three positive lymph nodes (N2). Patients with N2 disease had significantly reduced overall survival, as compared to patients with three or fewer positive lymph nodes (N1; p = 0.036). In univariate analysis, factors including age >75 years, body weight loss, tumor size ≤ 4 cm, N2 disease and lymph node ratio >0.4 predicted shorter overall survival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that N2 and lymph node ratio >0.4 are significant risk factors associated with overall survival (p = 0.026 and p = 0.042 respectively). N2 is also the only independent predictive factor for disease-free survival (p = 0.023).
CONCLUSION: Subdivision of metastatic lymph nodes into N1 and N2 improves predictive ability. The seventh edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system is applicable in the present study with regard to the prediction of the prognosis for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23158035     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2012.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc        ISSN: 1726-4901            Impact factor:   2.743


  6 in total

Review 1.  Limited resection vs. pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pipit Burasakarn; Ryota Higuchi; Souya Nunobe; Shingo Kanaji; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Ken-Ichi Okada; Tsutomu Fujii; Yuichi Nagakawa; Kengo Kanetaka; Hiroharu Yamashita; Suguru Yamada; Shinji Kuroda; Toru Aoyama; Takahiro Akahori; Kenji Nakagawa; Masakazu Yamamoto; Hiroki Yamaue; Masayuki Sho; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Duodenal adenocarcinoma successfully diagnosed with transabdominal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Hirokazu Yamazaki; Takanori Sakaguchi; Hatsuko Nasu; Katsutoshi Miura; Yasushi Shibasaki; Hajime Yuasa
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 3.  Duodenal adenocarcinoma: Advances in diagnosis and surgical management.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Elizabeth George; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-27

4.  The Prognostic Importance of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Patients Undergoing Curative Resection Followed by Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer.

Authors:  Byoung Hyuck Kim; Kyubo Kim; Eui Kyu Chie; Jeanny Kwon; Jin-Young Jang; Sun Whe Kim; Sae-Won Han; Do-Youn Oh; Seock-Ah Im; Tae-You Kim; Yung-Jue Bang; Sung W Ha
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Prognosis and nomogram for predicting postoperative survival of duodenal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study in China and the SEER database.

Authors:  Sujing Jiang; Rongjie Zhao; Yiran Li; Xufeng Han; Zhen Liu; Weiting Ge; Ying Dong; Weidong Han
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Outcomes and Treatment Options for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Laura L Meijer; Anna J Alberga; Jacob K de Bakker; Hans J van der Vliet; Tessa Y S Le Large; Nicole C T van Grieken; Ralph de Vries; Freek Daams; Barbara M Zonderhuis; Geert Kazemier
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.344

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.