Literature DB >> 23155323

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for foregut neuroendocrine tumors: an initial study.

Quan-Lin Li1, Yi-Qun Zhang, Wei-Feng Chen, Mei-Dong Xu, Yun-Shi Zhong, Li-Li Ma, Wen-Zheng Qin, Jian-Wei Hu, Ming-Yan Cai, Li-Qing Yao, Ping-Hong Zhou.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for foregut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).
METHODS: From April 2008 to December 2010, patients with confirmed histological diagnosis of foregut NETs were included. None had regional lymph node enlargement or distant metastases to the liver or lung on preoperative computerized tomography scanning or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). ESD was attempted under general anesthesia. After making several marking dots around the lesion, a mixture solution was injected into the submucosa. The mucosa was incised outside the marking dots. Dissection of the submucosal layer beneath the tumor was performed under direct vision to achieve complete en bloc resection of the specimen. Tumor features, clinicopathological characteristics, complete resection rate, and complications were evaluated. Foregut NETs were graded as G1, G2, or G3 on the basis of proliferative activity by mitotic count or Ki-67 index. All patients underwent regular follow-up to evaluate for any local recurrence or distant metastasis.
RESULTS: Those treated by ESD included 24 patients with 29 foregut NETs. The locations of the 29 lesions are as follows: esophagus (n = 1), cardia (n = 1), stomach (n = 23), and duodenal bulb (n = 4). All lesions were found incidentally during routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for other indications, and none had symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Preoperative EUS showed that all tumors were confined to the submucosa. Among the 24 gastric lesions, 16 lesions in 11 patients were type I gastric NETs arising in chronic atrophic gastritis with hypergastrinemia, while the other 8 solitary lesions were type III because of absence of atrophic gastritis in these cases. All of the tumors were removed in an en bloc fashion. The average maximum diameter of the lesions was 9.4 mm (range: 2-30 mm), and the procedure time was 20.3 min (range: 10-45 min). According to the World Health Organization 2010 classification, histological evaluation determined that 26 lesions were NET-G1, 2 gastric lesions were NET-G2, and 1 esophageal lesion was neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Complete resection was achieved in 28 lesions (28/29, 96.6%), and all of them were confined to the submucosa in histopathologic assessment with no lymphovascular invasion. The remaining patient with NEC underwent additional surgery because the resected specimens revealed angiolymphatic and muscularis invasion, as well as incomplete resection. Delayed bleeding occurred in 1 case 3 d after ESD, which was managed by endoscopic treatment. There were no procedure-related perforations. During a mean follow-up period of 24.4 mo (range: 12-48 mo), local recurrence occurred in only 1 patient 7 mo after initial ESD. This patient successfully underwent repeat ESD. Metastasis to lymph nodes or distal organs was not observed in any patient. No patients died during the study period.
CONCLUSION: ESD appears to be a safe, feasible, and effective procedure for providing accurate histopathological evaluations and curative treatment for eligible foregut NETs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Foregut; Neuroendocrine tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23155323      PMCID: PMC3484351          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i40.5799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  21 in total

Review 1.  Local endoscopic removal of duodenal carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  J Dalenbäck; G Havel
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Endosonography-guided endoscopic resection of duodenal carcinoid tumor.

Authors:  I Nishimori; M Morita; S Sano; J Kino-Ohsaki; T Kohsaki; K Suenaga; Y Yokoyama; S Onishi; T Sugimoto; K Araki
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Laparoscopic antrectomy for the treatment of type I gastric carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  Junko Ozao-Choy; Kerri Buch; James A Strauchen; Richard R P Warner; Celia M Divino
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Successful outcomes of a novel endoscopic treatment for GI tumors: endoscopic submucosal dissection with a mixture of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid, glycerin, and sugar.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Naohisa Yahagi; Masanori Nakamura; Naomi Kakushima; Shinya Kodashima; Satoshi Ono; Katsuya Kobayashi; Takuhei Hashimoto; Nobutake Yamamichi; Ayako Tateishi; Yasuhito Shimizu; Masashi Oka; Keiji Ogura; Takao Kawabe; Masao Ichinose; Masao Omata
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of gastric carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  J Ichikawa; S Tanabe; W Koizumi; Y Kida; H Imaizumi; M Kida; K Saigenji; H Mitomi
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 6.  Neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach (gastric carcinoids) are on the rise: small tumors, small problems?

Authors:  H Scherübl; G Cadiot; R T Jensen; T Rösch; U Stölzel; G Klöppel
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Attempted endoscopic en bloc resection of mucosal and submucosal tumors using insulated-tip knives: a pilot series.

Authors:  T Rösch; M Sarbia; B Schumacher; K Deinert; E Frimberger; T Toermer; M Stolte; H Neuhaus
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Minimally invasive surgery for resection of duodenal carcinoid tumors: endoscopic full-thickness resection under laparoscopic observation.

Authors:  Hironori Tsujimoto; Takashi Ichikura; Shigeaki Nagao; Tomoki Sato; Satoshi Ono; Satoshi Aiko; Shuichi Hiraki; Yoshihisa Yaguchi; Naoko Sakamoto; Takemaru Tanimizu; Junji Yamamoto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Endoscopic resection of small duodenal carcinoid tumors with strip biopsy technique.

Authors:  H Yoshikane; H Goto; Y Niwa; M Matsui; S Ohashi; T Suzuki; E Hamajima; T Hayakawa
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  En-bloc resection of multiple type 1 gastric carcinoid tumors by endoscopic multi-band mucosectomy.

Authors:  Andrew D Hopper; Michael J Bourke; Luke F Hourigan; Kayla Tran; Alan Moss; Michael P Swan
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.029

View more
  22 in total

1.  Efficiency and safety of endoscopic resection in the management of subepithelial lesions of the stomach.

Authors:  Sébastien Godat; Maxime Robert; Fabrice Caillol; Erwan Bories; Christian Pesenti; Chiara De Cassan; Jean Philippe Ratone; Flora Poizat; Marc Giovannini
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Well-Differentiated, Non-Functional, Non-Ampullary Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Toward Defining Evaluation and Management.

Authors:  Timothy Weatherall; Jason Denbo; John Sharpe; Michael Martin; Thomas O'Brien; Rajib Gupta; Kenneth Groshart; Stephen Behrman; Paxton Dickson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Somatostatin analogs for gastric carcinoids: For many, but not all.

Authors:  Sara Massironi; Alessandra Zilli; Dario Conte
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Esophagus: State of the Art in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management.

Authors:  Dimitrios Schizas; Aikaterini Mastoraki; George I Kirkilesis; Athanasios D Sioulas; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Evangelos P Misiakos; Nikolaos Arkadopoulos; Theodore Liakakos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-12

5.  Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus: clinical characteristics and prognostic evaluation of 49 cases with surgical resection.

Authors:  Han-Yu Deng; Peng-Zhi Ni; Yun-Cang Wang; Wen-Ping Wang; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Comparison study of gastrinomas between gastric and non-gastric origins.

Authors:  Song-Fong Huang; I-Ming Kuo; Chao-Wei Lee; Kuang-Tse Pan; Tse-Ching Chen; Chun-Jung Lin; Tsann-Long Hwang; Ming-Chin Yu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Feasibility of endoscopic resection for sessile nonampullary duodenal tumors: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Sung Min Park; Joo Ho Ham; Byung-Wook Kim; Joon Sung Kim; Chang Whan Kim; Jin Il Kim; Chul Hyun Lim; Jung Hwan Oh
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Patterns of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With T1/T2 Gastroduodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Implications for Endoscopic Treatment.

Authors:  Yu-Jie Zhou; Qi-Wen Wang; Qing-Wei Zhang; Jin-Nan Chen; Xin-Yuan Wang; Yun-Jie Gao; Xiao-Bo Li
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 9.  Endoscopic treatment for early foregut neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Moo In Park
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-09-30

10.  The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection of type I gastric carcinoid tumors compared with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Hyung Hun Kim; Gwang Ha Kim; Ji Hyun Kim; Myung-Gyu Choi; Geun Am Song; Sung Eun Kim
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.