Literature DB >> 23155132

Assessment of jugular endovascular malformations in chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: colour-Doppler scanning and catheter venography compared with intravascular ultrasound.

F Scalise1, M Farina, M Manfredi, C Auguadro, E Novelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) is a malformative condition characterized by several anomalies of the azygos and/or internal jugular veins (IJVs). Recommended diagnosis of CCSVI is performed with colour-Doppler (CD) sonography. Though catheter venography (CV) is considered as the gold standard for determining vascular anatomy, its uniplanar point of view does not allow an overall evaluation of endoluminal structures. This limit could be addressed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The aim of this report is to evaluate, in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), the accuracy of CD sonography and CV versus IVUS in estimating the diameter and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the IJVs and in detecting jugular endoluminal malformations (JEM).
METHOD: Forty-five MS patients with CCSVI, diagnosed by CD sonography, were submitted to CV during IJVs angioplasty. Twenty-five subjects were also examined with IVUS. The IJVs maximum diameter (MAXD) and CSA were estimated. CD and CV data were compared with IVUS data with the Bland-Altman method.
RESULTS: The mean difference in IJV MAXD recorded by CD and IVUS was -0.5 mm. The mean difference in IJV MAXD recorded by CV and IVUS was 3.36 mm. The mean difference in IJV CSA recorded by CD and IVUS was -11.2 mm(2). JEM recorded by IVUS were detected by CD sonography and CV with 88% and 32% accuracy, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: CV was significantly inferior to CD sonography and IVUS in detecting JEM. Differences between IVUS and CD sonography in detecting JEM and in quantifying jugular diameters were not significant. The IJV CSA was underestimated by CD sonography compared with IVUS. CD sonography was proven to be important in the anatomical characterization of CCSVI, providing useful information for correct intravascular treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCSVI; angioplasty; intravascular ultrasound; jugular vein; multiple sclerosis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23155132     DOI: 10.1258/phleb.2012.012079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phlebology        ISSN: 0268-3555            Impact factor:   1.740


  6 in total

Review 1.  Understanding jugular venous outflow disturbance.

Authors:  Da Zhou; Jia-Yue Ding; Jing-Yuan Ya; Li-Qun Pan; Feng Yan; Qi Yang; Yu-Chuan Ding; Xun-Ming Ji; Ran Meng
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 2.  The role of noninvasive and invasive diagnostic imaging techniques for detection of extra-cranial venous system anomalies and developmental variants.

Authors:  Kresimir Dolic; Adnan H Siddiqui; Yuval Karmon; Karen Marr; Robert Zivadinov
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Internal Jugular Vein Cross-Sectional Area Enlargement Is Associated with Aging in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Christopher Magnano; Pavel Belov; Jacqueline Krawiecki; Jesper Hagemeier; Clive Beggs; Robert Zivadinov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Anatomic measurements of cerebral venous sinuses in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients.

Authors:  Srikanth R Boddu; Pierre Gobin; Cristiano Oliveira; Marc Dinkin; Athos Patsalides
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Potential involvement of the extracranial venous system in central nervous system disorders and aging.

Authors:  Robert Zivadinov; Chih-Ping Chung
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Multimodal noninvasive and invasive imaging of extracranial venous abnormalities indicative of CCSVI: results of the PREMiSe pilot study.

Authors:  Robert Zivadinov; Yuval Karmon; Kresimir Dolic; Jesper Hagemeier; Karen Marr; Vesela Valnarov; Cheryl L Kennedy; David Hojnacki; Ellen M Carl; L Nelson Hopkins; Elad I Levy; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Adnan H Siddiqui
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 2.474

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.