Literature DB >> 23154365

Materials used for reconstruction after orbital floor fracture.

Yash J Avashia1, Ananth Sastry, Kenneth L Fan, Haaris S Mir, Seth R Thaller.   

Abstract

Advances in biotechnology continue to introduce new materials for reconstruction of orbital floor fractures. Which material is best fit for orbital floor reconstruction has been a controversial topic. Individual surgeon preferences have been supported by inconsistent inconclusive data. The purpose of this study was to assess and analyze published evidence supporting various materials used for orbital floor reconstruction and to develop a decision-making algorithm for clinical application. A systematic literature review was performed from which 48 studies were selected after primary and secondary screening based on set inclusion and exclusion criteria. This cumulatively included 3475 separate orbital floor reconstructions. Results revealed risk and benefit profiles for all materials. Autologous calvarial bone grafts, porous polyethylene, and polydioxanone (PDS) were most widely used for orbital floor reconstruction. Increased infection rates were reported with polyglactin 910/PDS composites and silastic rubber. Ocular motility was reduced most with lyophilized dura and PDS. Preoperative and postoperative rates for diplopia and enophthalmos varied among the materials. In conclusion, our results revealed continued inadequate evidence to exclusively support the use of any one biomaterial/implant for orbital floor reconstruction. Results have served to create a decision-making algorithm for clinical application. Our authors propose certain parameters for future studies seeking to demonstrate a comparison between 2 or more materials for orbital floor reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23154365     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825aada1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  19 in total

1.  Delayed Periorbital Abscess after Silicone Implant to Orbital Floor Fracture.

Authors:  Raj Dedhia; Travis T Tollefson
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-12-21

2.  Vertical diplopia and ptosis from removal of the orbital roof in pterional craniotomy.

Authors:  Shilpa J Desai; Michael T Lawton; Michael W McDermott; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Subacute Granulation Tissue of the Fornix after Resorbable Orbital Implant: An Unusual Case and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jaime Castro-Núñez; Trent Clifton; Joseph Van Sickels
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-07-17

Review 4.  Orbital reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of patient-specific implants.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kotecha; Ashley Ferro; Patrick Harrison; Kathleen Fan
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 5.  Controversies and Contemporary Management of Orbital Floor Fractures.

Authors:  Shivam Patel; Tom Shokri; Kasra Ziai; Jessyka G Lighthall
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-06-24

Review 6.  Trauma of the midface.

Authors:  Thomas S Kühnel; Torsten E Reichert
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

Review 7.  [Orbital traumatology].

Authors:  Cordula M C Deichmüller; H-J Welkoborsky
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Evaluation of orbital volume after orbitozygomatic complex fractures fixation: A radiographical study.

Authors:  Yehia A El-Mahallawy; Haytham A Al-Mahalawy
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-02-05

9.  Outcomes in Orbital Floor Trauma: A Comparison of Isolated and Zygomaticomaxillary-Associated Fractures.

Authors:  Shamit S Prabhu; Kshipra Hemal; Christopher M Runyan
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.172

10.  Comparison of pre-bent titanium mesh versus polyethylene implants in patient specific orbital reconstructions.

Authors:  Marcin Kozakiewicz; Piotr Szymor
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.