Literature DB >> 23154036

Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes after unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Tarja A Soininvaara1, Kristiina A L Harju, Hannu J A Miettinen, Heikki P J Kröger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has received renewed interest in the last decade. UKA involves minor injury to soft tissues, limited removal of bone and delicate preservation of knee anatomy and geometry. In theory, UKA provides an opportunity to restore post-surgical knee kinematics to near normal. HYPOTHESIS: UKA leaves patellofemoral joint free to meet high mechanical forces with no stress-shielding and therefore might preserve bone mineral density (BMD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 21 patients with osteoarthritis (OA), who had received medial compartment UKA at Kuopio University Hospital between October 1997 and September 2000. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), at baseline (within a week after surgery) and at intervals until 7 years.
RESULTS: DEXA results were reproducible. The highest rate of periprosthetic bone loss occurred during the first 3 months after UKA. The average loss in BMD was 4.4% (p = 0.039) in the femoral diaphysis and it ranged from 11.2% (p < 0.001) to 11.9% (p = 0.002) in the distal femoral metaphysis; however, BMD changes in these regions, from 2 years to 7 years, were nonsignificant. At the 1-year follow-up, the BMD of the medial tibial metaphysis had increased by 8.9% (p = 0.02), whereas those in the lateral tibial metaphysial (-2.4%) and diaphysial regions (-2.0%) did not change significantly. INTERPRETATIONS: UKA did not preserve periprosthetic BMD in the distal femoral metaphysis, whereas BMD changes in the tibial metaphysis were minor, consistent with a mechanical balance between the medial and lateral tibial compartments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2B: Prospective case control study.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23154036     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Valentina Cervi; Nicola Piolanti; Gianluca Ciapini; Lorenzo Andreani; Iacopo Castellini; Andrea Poggetti; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

2.  Kinematic alignment of medial UKA is safe: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charles Rivière; Sivan Sivaloganathan; Loic Villet; Philippe Cartier; Sébastien Lustig; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Progress of change in bone mineral density after knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Wenxing Wei; Yuangang Wu; Yi Zeng; Bin Shen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

4.  Variable bone mineral density reductions post-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mahmut Tuncer; Rajesh Patel; Justin P Cobb; Ulrich N Hansen; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity.

Authors:  Bastian Welke; Christof Hurschler; Marie Föller; Michael Schwarze; Tilman Calliess
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Familial Gigantiform Cementoma: Case Report of an Unusual Clinical Manifestation and Possible Mechanism Related To "Calcium Steal Disorder".

Authors:  Chunyue Ma; Hongwei Wang; Guang He; Xingjun Qin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.