Literature DB >> 23153935

Robotic partial nephrectomy for solitary kidney: a multi-institutional analysis.

Shahab P Hillyer1, Sam B Bhayani, Mohamad E Allaf, Craig G Rogers, Michael D Stifelman, Youssef Tanagho, Jeffrey K Mullins, Yichun Chiu, Bartosz F Kaczmarek, Jihad H Kaouk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for solitary kidney in a large multicenter series.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 886 consecutive patients who underwent RPN at 5 academic institutions from May 2007 to May 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Data were prospectively collected in an Investigational Review Board-approved protocol. Experienced robotic surgeons performed all operations. Patient demographics, functional, perioperative, and early oncologic outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with a solitary kidney were identified and included in the analysis; of these, 16 (62%) had solitary kidneys secondary to a previous malignancy. Perioperative outcomes included a median warm ischemia time of 17 minutes (interquartile range, 12, 28 minutes). Only 2 intraoperative complications occurred. One was a renal vein injury and one an aortic vessel tear, and both patients required intraoperative blood transfusions. No conversions to laparoscopy or open surgery occurred. There were 3 postoperative complications (11.5%). Median follow-up was 6 months (interquartile range, 5, 9.7 months). Postoperative renal function did not change significantly as measure by estimated glomerular filtration rate (-15.8%; P=.13). None of the patients required dialysis. Positive margins occurred in 1 patient, with 73% of patients having a renal cell carcinoma.
CONCLUSION: We report a multi-institutional series of RPN in patients with solitary kidney presenting with small renal masses. Our findings suggest that RPN represents a feasible treatment option in this specific population by offering reliable preservation of renal function, low surgical morbidity, and early oncologic safety in the hands of experienced robotic surgeons.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23153935     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Margins in Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Dean D Laganosky; Christopher P Filson; Viraj A Master
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  What is next in robotic urology?

Authors:  Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Arjun Sivaraman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  A multi-institutional report of peri-operative and functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with a solitary kidney.

Authors:  Zeynep Gul; Kyle A Blum; David J Paulucci; Ronney Abaza; Daniel D Eun; Akshay Bhandari; Ashok K Hemal; James Porter; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-10-12

Review 4.  Is robotic partial nephrectomy convenient for solitary kidney?

Authors:  Jihad H Kaouk; Ercan Malkoç
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

5.  Comparison of functional outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Zachary A Hamilton; Robert G Uzzo; Alessandro Larcher; Brian R Lane; Benjamin Ristau; Umberto Capitanio; Stephen Ryan; Sumi Dey; Andres Correa; Madhumitha Reddy; James A Proudfoot; Ryan Nasseri; Kendrick Yim; Sabrina Noyes; Ahmet Bindayi; Francesco Montorsi; Ithaar H Derweesh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Robotics in urology.

Authors:  Luke A McGuinness; Bhavan Prasad Rai
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Partial nephrectomy in solitary kidneys: comparison between open surgery and robotic-assisted laparoscopy on perioperative and functional outcomes (UroCCR-54 study).

Authors:  Ygal Benichou; François Audenet; Karim Bensalah; Morgan Roupret; Philippe Paparel; Cedric Lebacle; Franck Bruyère; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Arnauld Villers; Hervé Lang; Xavier Durand; Pierre Bigot; Jean Alexandre Long; Cécile Champy; Alexandre Lavolle; Jean Christophe Bernhard; Eric Alezra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Comparison of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score ≥10).

Authors:  Jung Kwon Kim; Hakmin Lee; Jong Jin Oh; Sangchul Lee; Sung Kyu Hong; Sang Eun Lee; Seok-Soo Byun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of Renal Function between Robot-Assisted and Open Partial Nephrectomy as Determined by Tc 99m-DTPA Renal Scintigraphy.

Authors:  Chanwoo Lee; Taekmin Kwon; Sangjun Yoo; Jaeyoon Jung; Chunwoo Lee; Dalsan You; In Gab Jeong; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Is surgeon intuition equivalent to models of operative complexity in determining the surgical approach for nephron sparing surgery?

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Barrett Z McCormick; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Wade J Sexton
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.