Literature DB >> 23153543

Including quality attributes in efficiency measures consistent with net benefit: creating incentives for evidence based medicine in practice.

Simon Eckermann1, Tim Coelli.   

Abstract

Evidence based medicine supports net benefit maximising therapies and strategies in processes of health technology assessment (HTA) for reimbursement and subsidy decisions internationally. However, translation of evidence based medicine to practice is impeded by efficiency measures such as cost per case-mix adjusted separation in hospitals, which ignore health effects of care. In this paper we identify a correspondence method that allows quality variables under control of providers to be incorporated in efficiency measures consistent with maximising net benefit. Including effects framed from a disutility bearing (utility reducing) perspective (e.g. mortality, morbidity or reduction in life years) as inputs and minimising quality inclusive costs on the cost-disutility plane is shown to enable efficiency measures consistent with maximising net benefit under a one to one correspondence. The method combines advantages of radial properties with an appropriate objective of maximising net benefit to overcome problems of inappropriate objectives implicit with alternative methods, whether specifying quality variables with utility bearing output (e.g. survival, reduction in morbidity or life years), hyperbolic or exogenous variables. This correspondence approach is illustrated in undertaking efficiency comparison at a clinical activity level for 45 Australian hospitals allowing for their costs and mortality rates per admission. Explicit coverage and comparability conditions of the underlying correspondence method are also shown to provide a robust framework for preventing cost-shifting and cream-skimming incentives, with appropriate qualification of analysis and support for data linkage and risk adjustment where these conditions are not satisfied. Comparison on the cost-disutility plane has previously been shown to have distinct advantages in comparing multiple strategies in HTA, which this paper naturally extends to a robust method and framework for comparing efficiency of health care providers in practice. Consequently, the proposed approach provides a missing link between HTA and practice, to allow active incentives for evidence based net benefit maximisation in practice.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23153543     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

1.  Hospital diagnostic aggregation and risk-adjusted quality.

Authors:  Chun Lok K Li
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Can the real opportunity cost stand up: displaced services, the straw man outside the room.

Authors:  Simon Eckermann; Brita Pekarsky
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Better informing decision making with multiple outcomes cost-effectiveness analysis under uncertainty in cost-disutility space.

Authors:  Nikki McCaffrey; Meera Agar; Janeane Harlum; Jonathon Karnon; David Currow; Simon Eckermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Aligning policy objectives and payment design in palliative care.

Authors:  Stephen Duckett
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.234

5.  Multiple effects health economic evaluation of the Ahead of The Game Study for mental health promotion in sporting club communities.

Authors:  Simon Eckermann; Nikki McCaffrey; Utsana Tonmukayakul; Christian Swann; Stewart Vella
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2021-08-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.