| Literature DB >> 23152779 |
Wei-Kung Tseng1, Jen-Jie Chieh, Yi-Fan Yang, Chih-Kang Chiang, Yuh-Lien Chen, Shieh Yueh Yang, Herng-Er Horng, Hong-Chang Yang, Chau-Chung Wu.
Abstract
Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) of Fe(3)O(4) have been widely applied in many medical fields, but few studies have clearly shown the outcome of particles following intravenous injection. We performed a magnetic examination using scanning SQUID biosusceptometry (SSB). Based on the results of SSB analysis and those of established in vitro nonmagnetic bioassays, this study proposes a model of MNP metabolism consisting of an acute metabolic phase with an 8 h duration that is followed by a chronic metabolic phase that continues for 28 d following MNP injection. The major features included the delivery of the MNPs to the heart and other organs, the biodegradation of the MNPs in organs rich with macrophages, the excretion of iron metabolites in the urine, and the recovery of the iron load from the liver and the spleen. Increases in serum iron levels following MNP injection were accompanied by increases in the level of transferrin in the serum and the number of circulating red blood cells. Correlations between the in vivo and in vitro test results indicate the feasibility of using SSB examination for the measurement of MNP concentrations, implying future clinical applications of SSB for monitoring the hematological effects of MNP injection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23152779 PMCID: PMC3495954 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Experimental Approach.
| Examination Type | Specimen | Methodology | Rat number/Time points for scanning examination | |
|
|
| • Magnetic measurement by SSB | 2 rats per each time point of 0 h, 0.5 | |
| h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 1 | ||||
| wk, 2 wk, and 4 wk | ||||
|
| • Magnetic measurement by SSB | 2 rats per each time point of 0 h, 1 h, | ||
| 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h | ||||
|
|
| • Magnetic measurement by SSB | 5 rats per each time point of 0 h, 0.5 | |
| • Serum iron test | h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 1 | |||
| • HCT test | wk, 2 wk, and 4 wk | |||
| • TIBC test | ||||
| • Transferrin test | ||||
|
| • Prussian blue staining | 5 rats per each time point of 0 h, 0.5 | ||
| • Magnetic measurement by SSB | h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 1 | |||
| • ICP test | wk, 2 wk, and 4 wk | |||
| • TEM test | 5 rats per each time point of 0 h, 2 h, | |||
| 8 h, 1 d, and 4 wk | ||||
|
| • Prussian blue staining | 5 rats per each time point of 0 h, 0.5 | ||
| • Magnetic measurement by SSB | h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 1 | |||
| • ICP test | wk, 2 wk, and 4 wk | |||
|
| • Prussian blue staining | 5 rats per each time point of 0 h, 0.5 | ||
| • Magnetic measurement by SSB | h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 1 | |||
| • ICP test | wk, 2 wk, and 4 wk | |||
|
| • Prussian blue staining | 5 rats per each time point of 0 h, 0.5 | ||
| • Magnetic measurement by SSB | h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, 3 d, 5 d, 1 | |||
| • ICP test | wk, 2 wk, and 4 wk | |||
| • TEM test | 5 rats per each time point of 0 h, 2 h, | |||
| 8 h, 1 d, and 4 wk | ||||
Figure 1In vivo and in vitro examinations by magnetic SSB.
Chest scans were performed for the in vivo examination on the heart (left lower panel), and tubes containing blood (right lower panel) drawn from the hearts of euthanized rats were scanned by SSB for the in vitro examination.
Figure 2Characteristics of the MF reagent.
(A) The particle size distribution, (B) the magnetism-applied field (M-H) curve of the MF reagent with a concentration of 0.9 emu/g, and (C) the stability of the MF reagent with a mean particle size of approximately 57 nm was monitored for 4 mo.
Figure 3In vivo and in vitro examinations of the blood.
(A) In vivo consisted of continuously scanning the heart using SSB from 0 to 4 h (n = 2) and scanning across the chest intermittently from 0 h to 4 wk (n = 2). The in vitro test of the blood using SSB was performed from 0 h to 4 wk (n = 5). (B) The in vitro HCT, serum iron concentration, transferrin, and TIBC tests were performed from 0 h to 4 wk (n = 5). Within the different time points in each methodology, star (*) denote significant differences in the data that are presented (p<0.05).
Figure 4In vitro examination of the liver.
(A) The in vitro magnetic SSB test results versus the ICP test results (from 0 h to 4 wk, n = 5). (B) Prussian blue staining (from 0 h to 4 wk, n = 5). (C) TEM images of representative macrophages in the liver tissue specimens of rats injected with the MNPs at 0 h, 2 h, 8 h, 1 d, and 4 wk. The arrows indicate the MNPs (Scale bars: 500 nm). Within the varying time points in each methodology, star (*) denote significant differences in the data that are presented (p<0.05).
Figure 5In vitro examination of the spleen.
(A) The in vitro magnetic SSB test results versus the ICP test results (from 0 h to 4 wk, n = 5). (B) Prussian blue staining (from 0 h to 4 wk, n = 5). Within the varying time points in each methodology, the different letters denote significant differences in the data that are presented (p<0.05).
Figure 6In vitro examination of the lung.
(A) The in vitro magnetic SSB test results versus the ICP test results (from 0 h to 4 wk, n = 5). (B) Prussian blue staining (from 0 h to 4 wk, n = 5). Within the varying time points in each methodology, star (*) denote significant differences in the data that are presented (p<0.05).
Figure 7In vitro examination of particle excretion in the kidney.
(A) The in vitro magnetic SSB measurements of the urine and kidney tissues versus the ICP test results for the kidney tissue (from 0 h to 4 wk, n = 5). (B) Prussian blue staining of the kidney tissue (from 0 h to 4 wk, n = 5). (C) TEM images of representative macrophages in the kidney specimens of the rats injected with the MNPs at 0 h, 2 h, 8 h, 1 d, and 4 wk. The arrows indicate the MNPs (Scale bars: 500 nm). Within the varying time points in each methodology, star (*) denote significant differences in the data that are presented (p<0.05).