Steven N Leonard1, Kiri M Rolek. 1. Northeastern University, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, 360 Huntington Ave, R218 TF, Boston, MA 02115, USA. s.leonard@neu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Continued selective pressure from glycopeptide use has led to non-susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA). Though relatively uncommon, VISA presents a particularly difficult clinical challenge when it arises. Pertinent to this investigation is the correlation between vancomycin intermediacy and daptomycin non-susceptibility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential for synergy between daptomycin and nafcillin against VISA. METHODS: Twenty VISA strains were evaluated for daptomycin and nafcillin MICs by broth microdilution in duplicate. Potential for synergy was assessed by time-kill at 0.5× MIC in triplicate. Four strains displaying synergy in time-kill analysis were analysed in an in vitro pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model in duplicate over 72 h. RESULTS: In time-kill experiments, 55% of strains (11/20) displayed synergy with the combination. In the PK/PD model, no differences between daptomycin-alone and combination regimens were observed for the strain with the lowest daptomycin MIC (0.5 mg/L). For the strain with a daptomycin MIC of 1 mg/L, 6 mg/kg daptomycin+nafcillin was superior to 6 mg/kg daptomycin alone (P=0.002) and 10 mg/kg daptomycin+nafcillin was superior to all other regimens (P ≤ 0.004). When the daptomycin MIC increased to 2 mg/L, 10 mg/kg daptomycin+nafcillin was superior to 6 mg/kg daptomycin+nafcillin, which was superior to both 6 and 10 mg/kg daptomycin alone (P ≤ 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin and nafcillin in combination significantly improved antibacterial activity against VISA. This effect was more pronounced as the daptomycin susceptibility of the strain declined.
OBJECTIVES: Continued selective pressure from glycopeptide use has led to non-susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA). Though relatively uncommon, VISA presents a particularly difficult clinical challenge when it arises. Pertinent to this investigation is the correlation between vancomycin intermediacy and daptomycin non-susceptibility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential for synergy between daptomycin and nafcillin against VISA. METHODS: Twenty VISA strains were evaluated for daptomycin and nafcillin MICs by broth microdilution in duplicate. Potential for synergy was assessed by time-kill at 0.5× MIC in triplicate. Four strains displaying synergy in time-kill analysis were analysed in an in vitro pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model in duplicate over 72 h. RESULTS: In time-kill experiments, 55% of strains (11/20) displayed synergy with the combination. In the PK/PD model, no differences between daptomycin-alone and combination regimens were observed for the strain with the lowest daptomycin MIC (0.5 mg/L). For the strain with a daptomycin MIC of 1 mg/L, 6 mg/kg daptomycin+nafcillin was superior to 6 mg/kg daptomycin alone (P=0.002) and 10 mg/kg daptomycin+nafcillin was superior to all other regimens (P ≤ 0.004). When the daptomycin MIC increased to 2 mg/L, 10 mg/kg daptomycin+nafcillin was superior to 6 mg/kg daptomycin+nafcillin, which was superior to both 6 and 10 mg/kg daptomycin alone (P ≤ 0.019). CONCLUSIONS:Daptomycin and nafcillin in combination significantly improved antibacterial activity against VISA. This effect was more pronounced as the daptomycin susceptibility of the strain declined.
Authors: Masayuki Nigo; Lorena Diaz; Lina P Carvajal; Truc T Tran; Rafael Rios; Diana Panesso; Juan D Garavito; William R Miller; Audrey Wanger; George Weinstock; Jose M Munita; Cesar A Arias; Henry F Chambers Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Steven Y C Tong; Joshua S Davis; Emily Eichenberger; Thomas L Holland; Vance G Fowler Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Jordan R Smith; Anu Arya; Juwon Yim; Katie E Barber; Jessica Hallesy; Nivedita B Singh; Michael J Rybak Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Andrew D Berti; George Sakoulas; Victor Nizet; Ryan Tewhey; Warren E Rose Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Cristina García-de-la-Mària; Oriol Gasch; Javier García-Gonzalez; Dolors Soy; Evelyn Shaw; Juan Ambrosioni; Manel Almela; Juan M Pericàs; Adrián Tellez; Carlos Falces; Marta Hernandez-Meneses; Elena Sandoval; Eduard Quintana; Barbara Vidal; Jose M Tolosana; David Fuster; Jaume Llopis; Miquel Pujol; Asuncion Moreno; Francesc Marco; Jose M Miró Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 5.191