Literature DB >> 23152269

Routine neonatal circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infections in infancy.

Vanitha A Jagannath1, Zbys Fedorowicz, Vikas Sud, Abhishek Kumar Verma, Sakineh Hajebrahimi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neonatal circumcision is a fairly common surgical procedure that may be carried out for medical reasons, one of them being prevention of urinary tract infections (UTI) in male infants. Circumcision could help in reducing the incidence of UTI by reducing periurethral bacterial colonization, which is accepted as a potential risk factor in UTI. Evidence is needed to inform the benefits or harm for the routine use of this intervention.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of routine neonatal circumcision for the prevention of UTIs in infancy. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We completed this search 30 June 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors had planned to independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using standard Cochrane Collaboration methodologies. We did not identify any studies for inclusion in this review. MAIN
RESULTS: We did not identify any relevant studies after a comprehensive search of the literature. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to identify any randomised controlled trials on the use of routine neonatal circumcision for prevention of UTI in male infants. Until further evidence becomes available, clinicians should continue to base their decisions on position statements and recommendations and in conjunction with the opinions of the children's parents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23152269     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009129.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  7 in total

1.  [Nonretractable foreskin in boys without complaints : An indication for circumcision?]

Authors:  K Eckert; N Janssen; M Franz; P Liedgens
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Vesicoureteral reflux : Watchful waiting, surgery or antibiotic prophylaxis?]

Authors:  A Schröder
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Acute pyelonephritis in children.

Authors:  William Morello; Claudio La Scola; Irene Alberici; Giovanni Montini
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  The prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux in infants with first urinary tract infection following circumcision is similar to infants with UTI not following circumcision.

Authors:  Orli Megged; Yehonatan Koriat
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  The Relationship between Neonatal Circumcision, Urinary Tract Infection, and Health.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Deron Galusha; William A Kennedy; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 5.400

7.  Health service provider education and/or training in infant male circumcision to improve short- and long-term morbidity outcomes: protocol for systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Gyan; Natalie Strobel; Kimberley McAuley; Caitlin Shannon; Sam Newton; Charlotte Tawiah-Agyemang; Seeba Amenga-Etego; Seth Owusu-Agyei; David Forbes; Karen Edmond
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.