Literature DB >> 23151939

Characterizing long-term land use/cover change in the United States from 1850 to 2000 using a nonlinear bi-analytical model.

Sanjiv Kumar1, Venkatesh Merwade, P Suresh C Rao, Bryan C Pijanowski.   

Abstract

We relate the historical (1850-2000) spatial and temporal changes in cropland cover in the conterminous United States to several socio-economic and biophysical determinants using an eco-region based spatial framework. Results show population density as a major determinant during the nineteenth century, and biophysical suitability as the major determinant during the twentieth century. We further examine the role of technological innovations, socio-economic and socio-ecological feedbacks that have either sustained or altered the cropland trajectories in different eco-regions. The cropland trajectories for each of the 84 level-III eco-regions were analyzed using a nonlinear bi-analytical model. In the Eastern United States, low biophysically suitable eco-regions, e.g., New England, have shown continual decline in the cropland after reaching peak levels. The cropland trajectories in high biophysically suitable regions, e.g., Corn Belt, have stabilized after reaching peak levels. In the Western United States, low-intensity crop cover (<10 %) is sustained with irrigation support. A slower rate of land conversion was found in the industrial period. Significant effect of Conservation Reserve Program on planted crop area is found in last two decades (1990-2010).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23151939      PMCID: PMC3606703          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-012-0354-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  7 in total

1.  An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle.

Authors:  Nicolas Gruber; James N Galloway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Midwest U.S. landscape change to 2020 driven by biofuel mandates.

Authors:  Megan Mehaffey; Elizabeth Smith; Rick Van Remortel
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.657

Review 3.  Global consequences of land use.

Authors:  Jonathan A Foley; Ruth Defries; Gregory P Asner; Carol Barford; Gordon Bonan; Stephen R Carpenter; F Stuart Chapin; Michael T Coe; Gretchen C Daily; Holly K Gibbs; Joseph H Helkowski; Tracey Holloway; Erica A Howard; Christopher J Kucharik; Chad Monfreda; Jonathan A Patz; I Colin Prentice; Navin Ramankutty; Peter K Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Human modification of global water vapor flows from the land surface.

Authors:  Line J Gordon; Will Steffen; Bror F Jönsson; Carl Folke; Malin Falkenmark; Ase Johannessen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass.

Authors:  David Tilman; Jason Hill; Clarence Lehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  People on the land: changes in global population and croplands during the 20th century.

Authors:  Navin Ramankutty; Jonathan A Foley; Nicholas J Olejniczak
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Nitrogen use in the United States from 1961-2000 and potential future trends.

Authors:  Robert W Howarth; Elizabeth W Boyer; Wendy J Pabich; James N Galloway
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.129

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Analyzing historical land use changes using a Historical Land Use Reconstruction Model: a case study in Zhenlai County, northeastern China.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Yang; Shuwen Zhang; Yansui Liu; Xiaoshi Xing; Alex de Sherbinin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Crop yield response to climate change varies with crop spatial distribution pattern.

Authors:  Guoyong Leng; Maoyi Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.