| Literature DB >> 23151473 |
N S H N Moorthy1, Natércia F Brás, Maria J Ramos, Pedro A Fernandes.
Abstract
Virtual screening and QSAR analysis were carried out to investigate the binding features of (2R, 3R, 4S)-2-aminomethylpyrrolidine 3,4-diol and the functionalized pyrrolidine derivatives to the α-mannosidase I and II enzymes. The QSAR models (possessed considerable R(2), Q(2) values, etc.) suggested that the presence of polar property on the vdW surface (vsurf_W, vsurf_Wp, etc.) of the molecules is important along with the presence of aromatic rings (opr_violation) in the molecules (which also provide hydrophobicity to the molecules). The docking study performed on α-mannosidase I and II enzymes pointed that the main interactions occur by hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic π-π stacking contacts and salt bridges with the cation calcium (for α-mannosidase I) and close interaction with zinc ion (α-mannosidase II), respectively. The bond flexibility orientates the aromatic ring in the molecules toward the hydrophobic cavity for π-π stacking contacts with the aromatic amino acids (Phe528, Phe329 and Phe659 for α-mannosidase I and Trp95, Tyr269, Phe312, Tyr102 for α-mannosidase II). The pharmacophore analysis also supports the results derived from the docking and QSAR studies. Our results suggest that the best compound to inhibit both classes of α-mannosidase is the compound 30, which may be used to design similar and better inhibitors to next generation drugs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23151473 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.10.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioorg Med Chem ISSN: 0968-0896 Impact factor: 3.641