Literature DB >> 23151442

Steady-state indicators of the intracranial pressure dynamic system using geodesic distance of the ICP pulse waveform.

Xiao Hu1, Nestor Gonzalez, Marvin Bergsneider.   

Abstract

Normal functioning of the brain depends on the homeostasis (∼ steady state) of its various physiological sub-systems, one of which is the intracranial pressure (ICP) dynamic system. The ICP dynamic system of an injured brain is susceptible to various acute changes that should ideally be detected by ICP monitoring even for comatose patients. However, the status quo of ICP monitoring solely targets mean ICP. We aimed to demonstrate a novel approach to detect acute deviation from steady state of an ICP dynamic system in an absence of significant mean ICP changes. We hypothesized that steady state of ICP dynamic systems is reflected as ICP pulses of similar mean ICP levels resembling each other for a given subject. A general framework was used to derive such a steady-state indicator that can accommodate different metrics of inter-pulse distance and different statistics of the distance histograms. In addition to conventional Euclidean distance and Pearson correlation, geodesic distance between pulses was introduced as a novel metric. These different ways of calculating steady-state indicators under the proposed framework were evaluated on three types of continuous ICP recordings: (1) those between two consecutive brain imaging studies that demonstrated acute ventricular enlargement for slit ventricle syndrome (SVS) patients undergoing a trial of shunt externalization and clamping (SVS+); (2) those between consecutive brain imaging studies from the SVS patients under the same trial but without ventricular enlargement (SVS-); (3) overnight recordings from normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) patients. It was observed that only the standard deviation of geodesic distance correctly differentiated between SVS+ and SVS- and between SVS+ and NPH while avoiding discriminating between SVS- and NPH. It was also found that 45% SVS+ cases had a multimodal geodesic distance histogram while none of SVS- and 3.8% of NPH cases had such a multimodal histogram. Pulses with a large number of distant pulses for the five multimodal-histogram SVS+ cases fell in short time windows indicating that acute ventricular changes may have occurred in these confined time windows during which no significant changes of mean ICP were observed. In contrast, the pulses with a large number of distant pulses for the two multimodal-histogram NPH cases did not cluster temporally. In conclusion, the geodesic inter-pulse distance is a promising metric to quantify distance intrinsic to the underneath geometric structure of ICP signals and hence is a more suitable way to derive a steady-state indicator of an ICP dynamic system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23151442      PMCID: PMC3547535          DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/12/2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  19 in total

1.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction.

Authors:  J B Tenenbaum; V de Silva; J C Langford
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Intracranial pressure pulse morphological features improved detection of decreased cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Thomas Glenn; Fabien Scalzo; Marvin Bergsneider; Chris Sarkiss; Neil Martin; Paul Vespa
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.833

3.  A new method for processing of continuous intracranial pressure signals.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and intracranial volume-pressure relationships.

Authors:  C J Avezaat; J H van Eijndhoven; D J Wyper
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 5.  Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Marek Czosnyka; Zofia Czosnyka; Shahan Momjian; John D Pickard
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  Continuous monitoring of the Monro-Kellie doctrine: is it possible?

Authors:  Dong-Joo Kim; Zofia Czosnyka; Magdalena Kasprowicz; Piotr Smieleweski; Oliver Baledent; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; John D Pickard; Marek Czosnyka
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Inferring cerebrovascular changes from latencies of systemic and intracranial pulses: a model-based latency subtraction algorithm.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Andrew W Subudhi; Peng Xu; Shadnaz Asgari; Robert C Roach; Marvin Bergsneider
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Morphological clustering and analysis of continuous intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Peng Xu; Fabien Scalzo; Paul Vespa; Marvin Bergsneider
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Effects of hypercapnia and arterial hypotension and hypertension on cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and intracranial volume-pressure relationships.

Authors:  C J Avezaat; J H van Eijndhoven; D J Wyper
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 10.  Surgical management of adult hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Marvin Bergsneider; Chad Miller; Paul M Vespa; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  3 in total

1.  Characterization of Shape Differences Among ICP Pulses Predicts Outcome of External Ventricular Drainage Weaning Trial.

Authors:  Jorge Arroyo-Palacios; Maryna Rudz; Richard Fidler; Wade Smith; Nerissa Ko; Soojin Park; Yong Bai; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Data-Augmented Modeling of Intracranial Pressure.

Authors:  Jian-Xun Wang; Xiao Hu; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Patient-adaptable intracranial pressure morphology analysis using a probabilistic model-based approach.

Authors:  Paria Rashidinejad; Xiao Hu; Stuart Russell
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.833

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.