| Literature DB >> 23150834 |
Nevin M Habeeb1, Omneya I Youssef, Eman S El Hadidi.
Abstract
Dilated cardiomyopathy is an important cause of congestive cardiac failure in infants and children. Mobilizing hematopoietic progenitor cells is a promising intervention to this deadly disease. Aim. Evaluate granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) as therapeutic modality in children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM). Subjects and Methods. This case-control prospective study was conducted on 20 children with IDCM following up at Cardiology Clinic Children's Hospital, Ain Shams University (group 1) who were compared to another 10 age-, sex-, duration-of-illness-, and systolic-function-matched children with IDCM as control (group 2). They were subjected to history taking, clinical examination, echocardiography, and peripheral blood CD34+ cell assessment before and one week after GCSF intake for 5 consecutive days (by group 1 but not group 2). Results. A significant improvement in echocardiographic data and CD34+-T-cell increase was found in group 1 one week after GCSF intake and for the next 6 months CD34+ T cells percentage of change showed no significant correlation with the that of the left ventricular dimensions and systolic function. Conclusion. Administration of GCSF to children with IDCM resulted in clinical and echocardiographic improvement not correlated to mobilized CD34+ T cells, implying involvement of additional mechanisms over simple stem cell mobilization.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23150834 PMCID: PMC3485505 DOI: 10.5402/2012/927968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Pediatr ISSN: 2090-469X
Comparison between echocardiographic data and cluster of differentiation 34 T cells of group 1 patients before and after treatment.
| Echo parameter | Before treatment | After treatment | Percentage of change | Test value |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Standard deviation | Mean | Standard deviation | ||||
| Ejection fraction | 31.2 | 9.2 | 46.9 | 7.9 | 50.3 | 8.472 | <0.001 |
| Fractional shortening | 15.0 | 4.8 | 23.2 | 4.3 | 54.9 | 7.752 | <0.001 |
| Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (cm) | 4.8 | 1.0 | 4.6 | 0.9 | −4.2 | 1.751 | 0.096 |
| Cluster of differentiation 34 T cells | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 200 | 5.174 | <0.001 |
Comparison between New York Heart Association class of group 1 patients before and after GCSF treatment.
| New York Heart Association classification before treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| After treatment | I | II | III-IV |
|
| Number = 2 (10%) | Number = 12 (60%) | Number = 6 (30%) | ||
| I | 2 (100) | 11 (91.7) | 2 (33.3) | |
| II | 0 | 1 (8.3) | 2 (33.3) | 0.002 |
| III-IV | 0 | 0 | 2 (33.3) | |
Correlation between the percentage of change of the echocardiographic data and the cluster of differentiation 34 T cells in group 1 after treatment.
| Studied echocardiographic and laboratory parameters | Ejection fraction percentage of change | Fractional shortening percentage of change | Left ventricular end diastolic diameter percentage of change | Cluster of differentiation 34 T cells percentage of change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ejection fraction percentage of change |
| 1 | |||
|
| — | ||||
| Fractional shortening percentage of change |
| .986 ( | 1 | ||
|
| <0.001 | — | |||
| Left ventricular end diastolic diameter percentage of change |
| −.149 | −.085 | 1 | |
|
| 0.530 | 0.722 | — | ||
| Cluster of differentiation 34 T cells percentage of change |
| .119 | .087 | .116 | 1 |
|
| 0.616 | 0.714 | .625 | — | |