Literature DB >> 23150162

Validation of a novel smartphone accelerometer-based knee goniometer.

Matthew Ockendon1, Robin E Gilbert.   

Abstract

Loss of full knee extension following anterior cruciate ligament surgery has been shown to impair knee function. However, there can be significant difficulties in accurately and reproducibly measuring a fixed flexion of the knee. We studied the interobserver and the intraobserver reliabilities of a novel, smartphone accelerometer-based, knee goniometer and compared it with a long-armed conventional goniometer for the assessment of fixed flexion knee deformity. Five healthy male volunteers (age range 30 to 40 years) were studied. Measurements of knee flexion angle were made with a telescopic-armed goniometer (Lafayette Instrument, Lafayette, IN) and compared with measurements using the smartphone (iPhone 3GS, Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) knee goniometer using a novel trigonometric technique based on tibial inclination. Bland-Altman analysis of validity and reliability including statistical analysis of correlation by Pearson's method was undertaken. The iPhone goniometer had an interobserver correlation (r) of 0.994 compared with 0.952 for the Lafayette. The intraobserver correlation was r = 0.982 for the iPhone (compared with 0.927). The datasets from the two instruments correlate closely (r = 0.947) are proportional and have mean difference of only -0.4 degrees (SD 3.86 degrees). The Lafayette goniometer had an intraobserver reliability +/- 9.6 degrees. The interobserver reliability was +/- 8.4 degrees. By comparison the iPhone had an interobserver reliability +/- 2.7 degrees and an intraobserver reliability +/- 4.6 degrees. We found the iPhone goniometer to be a reliable tool for the measurement of subtle knee flexion in the clinic setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23150162     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  20 in total

1.  Reply to letter to the editor: Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Orrin I Franko
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Sensitivity of fNIRS measurement to head motion: an applied use of smartphones in the lab.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Joseph M Baker; Ning Liu; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  The smartphone inclinometer: A new tool to determine elbow range of motion?

Authors:  Frédéric Vauclair; Abdulaziz Aljurayyan; Fahad H Abduljabbar; Bardia Barimani; Patrick Goetti; Fiona Houghton; Edward J Harvey; Dominique M Rouleau
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-19

4.  Smartphone assessment of knee flexion compared to radiographic standards.

Authors:  Matthew J Dietz; Daniel Sprando; Andrew E Hanselman; Michael D Regier; Benjamin M Frye
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Comparison of self-reported and measured range of motion in total knee arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Bayram Unver; Abdurrahman Nalbant; Vasfi Karatosun
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-08

6.  "Is There An App For That?" Orthopaedic Patient Preferences For A Smartphone Application.

Authors:  Jonathan R Datillo; Daniel J Gittings; Matthew Sloan; William M Hardaker; Matthew J Deasey; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 7.  The reliability and validity of goniometric elbow measurements in adults: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Suzanne F van Rijn; Elisa L Zwerus; Koen Lm Koenraadt; Wilco Ch Jacobs; Michel Pj van den Bekerom; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-06-03

8.  A Non-Contact Measurement System for the Range of Motion of the Hand.

Authors:  Trieu Pham; Pubudu N Pathirana; Hieu Trinh; Pearse Fay
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Reliability of measuring the passive range of shoulder horizontal adduction using a smartphone in the supine versus the side-lying position.

Authors:  Jin-Yong Lim; Tae-Ho Kim; Jung-Seok Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-10-30

Review 10.  Mobile Phone-Based Joint Angle Measurement for Functional Assessment and Rehabilitation of Proprioception.

Authors:  Quentin Mourcou; Anthony Fleury; Bruno Diot; Céline Franco; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.